Rows of Cubicles in an Office

(© dbvirago - stock.adobe.com)

In A Nutshell

  • More than a third of 5,750 surveyed workers (37%) say their ideal week is four days or shorter, capped at 28 hours.
  • Half (51%) want the workday to start before 9 a.m., and 42% want to leave before 5 p.m.
  • Friday is the favored day off: 40% want their weekend to start then, versus 19% who prefer Mondays off.

For decades, a full-time job has meant 40 hours a week, five days a week, 9 to 5. A new international survey finds a large share of workers would happily toss out most of that formula. More than a third of respondents (37%) say their ideal schedule is a four-day workweek or shorter, capped at 28 hours. Compared with a standard 40-hour week, that cuts 12 hours, or about a day and a half of work.

Workers also want to move the clock. Half of those polled (51%) say the perfect workday starts before 9 a.m., and 42% want to clock out before 5 p.m. For many, the ideal day starts early and ends early, with little loyalty left for the old 9-to-5 frame.

Talker Research gathered the responses from 5,750 freelancers and full-time employees in five countries. Fiverr, an online marketplace that connects businesses with freelancers, paid for the survey. That gives the company a stake in results that make freelance-style work look appealing, and readers should keep it in mind as the numbers unfold.

Inside the four-day workweek wish list

Researchers surveyed 2,850 freelancers and 2,900 full-time employees from the U.S., the U.K., Canada, Germany and Australia between Sept. 21 and Sept. 29, 2026. All of them answered online. Questions covered how workplace trends have changed their daily routines and what an ideal workday would look like.

For people dreaming of a shorter week, the choice of which day to drop is lopsided. Two in five respondents (40%) want their weekend to start on Friday, while 19% would rather have Mondays off.

Meetings get trimmed in the ideal day, too. Respondents want no more than three meetings a day on average, yet a third of them currently sit through more than that. Freelancers average fewer meetings, though they also work about two hours more per week than full-time employees. A freer schedule, in other words, doesn’t always mean a lighter one.

Wanting a shorter week is one thing; expecting one is another. Asked which trends will shape the future of work, 29% picked four-day weeks. That put shorter weeks just behind AI assistants (32%) and working from anywhere (30%).

zoom computer bored
A survey of workers in five countries finds 37% want a 28-hour, four-day workweek, and half say the perfect workday would start before 9 a.m. (Credit: Andrea Piacquadio from Pexels)

Office workers borrow freelancer habits

Full-time employees have been picking up what the survey calls “freelancer first” practices. Flexible work hours top the list (26%), followed by setting their own daily priorities (23%) and tracking their own output (22%). About one in five also keeps a professional profile (21%) or holds meetings by video instead of in person (21%).

Employers are nudging in that direction as well. Among respondents, 37% say their company encourages using generative AI tools, and 17% say it encourages being paid per project.

Some workers would pay for more control. Among full-time employees, 43% would take a pay cut if it meant being their own boss. According to the release, the average respondent would give up about a quarter of their salary (24%) to make that happen.

“We’re seeing a confluence of reasons that are pushing the world to work the way freelancers do, from freedom and flexibility to the chance to pursue their passions and choose the projects they work on,” said Sharon Steiner, chief human resources officer at Fiverr.

AI and the future of the four-day workweek

Shorter weeks share the wish list with new technology. Respondents expect AI fluency to become a job requirement (26%), and 22% of employees say it already is one. Most respondents believe it’s important to invest time learning how AI can improve their workflow (74%) and then to follow through on that learning (71%).

Freelancers appear quicker to jump in. A third of them (33%) said they wanted to adopt AI “immediately,” compared with 27% of full-time employees.

“The emergence of AI has fundamentally shifted how, where and when people are working today,” Steiner said.

Readers should be clear about one limit: the survey doesn’t measure whether AI actually shortens anyone’s week. It captures what workers want and expect, not what their employers have agreed to.

For generations, the 40-hour week has held its ground. A 28-hour version now has a sizable fan base, with more than a third of workers in five countries ready to cut the hours and claim Friday. Whether bosses will sign off is a separate question, and one that a survey paid for by a freelance marketplace can’t answer.


Survey Notes

Methodology

Talker Research surveyed 2,850 freelancers and 2,900 full-time employees, 5,750 people in total, from the U.S., the U.K., Canada, Germany and Australia who have internet access. Talker Research administered and conducted the survey online between Sept. 21 and Sept. 29, 2026. The results describe what respondents reported about their preferences, habits and expectations; they do not measure actual changes in hours worked or employer policy. Talker Research lists the survey’s full methodology on its Process and Methodology page as part of the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) Transparency Initiative.

Funding and Disclosures

Fiverr commissioned the survey. Fiverr operates an online marketplace for freelance services and has a commercial interest in findings about growing interest in freelance work. Quoted comments come from Sharon Steiner, Fiverr’s chief human resources officer.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor