wild pigeon and nest

(Credit: © Alex Yeung - stock.adobe.com)

Pigeon Dads Fill In When Moms Leave Nests to Find Food

In A Nutshell

  • Pigeon dads sat on eggs about 22 percent of the day in unfed colonies, compared to 17 percent in fed ones.
  • Fed moms weighed about 10 percent more and sat longer, while dads’ weight stayed about the same.
  • Nests stayed covered about 98 percent of the time whether food was scarce or plentiful.
  • Chicks may still go hungry after hatching, so feeding bans alone may not curb pigeon numbers.

Feral pigeon fathers do not slack off when food is hard to find. They double down. A new study tracking German pigeon colonies found males increased the time they spent sitting on eggs by about five percentage points during food shortages, stepping in exactly when females cut back to go search for food. The result: nests stayed covered roughly 98 percent of the time whether food was plentiful or scarce.

Females typically handle the bulk of the egg-sitting, including overnight shifts. Males take what ornithologist Alexander Skutch described decades ago as “one long session each day.” Feral pigeons breed up to five times a year, typically laying two eggs each time, which has helped them multiply in cities. Feeding bans are a common response, so researchers wanted to know how that uneven arrangement holds up when food disappears, especially since earlier research found pigeon hatching success stayed stable under low-food conditions.

To find out, scientists reporting in Royal Society Open Science placed custom weight sensors beneath nests across 20 pigeon colonies in three German cities. Their readings point to pigeons handling scarcity as a team.

Pigeons Split Egg Duty Unevenly, Like Woodpeckers and Some Penguins

More than 80 percent of bird species raise their young cooperatively, but cooperation does not always mean an equal split. Some species divide egg-sitting almost evenly. Others lean heavily on one parent, with a “helper” pitching in for a smaller share. Woodpeckers, certain larks, and some penguins follow this lopsided pattern. So do pigeons. In an even partnership, a food shortage should hit both parents equally hard. In a lopsided one, the parent doing most of the sitting should suffer most, since that bird has the least spare time to find food.

pigeon dads
Feeding bans may not stop pigeon eggs from hatching. A new study finds dads cover for moms when food is scarce. (Image by StudyFinds)

Weight Sensors Showed Which Parent Was Likely Sitting on Each Nest

Male and female pigeons are hard to tell apart by sight, so researchers built weight-sensing platforms and placed them underneath nests in 20 colonies across Braunschweig, Munich, and Würzburg between July and November 2025. Each plate recorded weight every 15 minutes, around the clock, for up to two weeks. Because females tend to weigh less than males and are known to take the overnight shift, shifts in recorded weight helped researchers work out which parent was on the nest.

Half the colonies were “fed” groups living in rooftop shelters where grain, peas, and water are provided as part of city pigeon management programs. Food was never fully eaten, so fed birds likely had more than enough. The other half were “control” groups nesting in spots like church roofs, ceiling panels, and pigeon towers, finding all their own food. Researchers treated the unfed colonies as food-limited, an assumption backed by how much heavier fed females ended up. Usable data on egg-sitting came from 36 fed nests and 21 control nests, with body weights from 75 females and 65 males.

Local animal welfare groups and city officials were already swapping real eggs for dummy versions on regular rounds as population control, and researchers joined those visits to place the sensors. Most birds returned within 15 to 45 minutes, though about one-third moved their eggs or built a new nest nearby, and only nests where the sensors worked were included.

Dads Covered About 22 Percent of the Day When Food Was Scarce, Versus 17 Percent When Fed

Extra feeding made a clear difference for females but not for males. Fed females weighed about 35 grams more on average, roughly 10 percent heavier. They also spent more time on the nest: about 81 percent of the day versus 75 percent for unfed females, roughly an hour and a half more per day.

Males told a different story. In fed colonies, where females sat longer, males dropped to about 17 percent of the day on the nest compared to 22 percent in unfed colonies. Male body weight barely budged between groups, suggesting males were already finding enough food on their own.

Despite these shifts, nests were covered at the same rate in both groups. Daily shifts held steady at roughly five, which points to birds under food stress taking longer foraging trips rather than more frequent short ones.

Stable Egg Coverage May Only Delay the Problem Until Chicks Hatch

Researchers say this uneven teamwork helps parents shield their eggs from food shortages. Because male pigeons normally do less sitting, they likely carry spare energy and free time, giving them room to pick up extra shifts without hitting the energy limits females face. That flexibility may explain why pigeons keep hatching eggs at normal rates when food is scarce, something earlier research noticed but could not fully explain.

That protection covers only the egg stage. Once chicks hatch, both parents feed them crop milk, a nutrient-rich liquid pigeons produce, and earlier research suggests many nestlings starve when food stays scarce. This study did not follow chicks after hatching, so that link rests on earlier work.

That means feeding bans may fail to reduce how many eggs hatch and instead shift the suffering to after birth. Cities trying to reduce pigeon populations may need to focus earlier in the breeding cycle, such as preventing eggs from hatching, rather than relying on food scarcity. With fathers covering the nest, hunger alone may be a weak tool against pigeon eggs.


Paper Notes

Limitations

Researchers note that colonies were not randomly selected but were identified through existing pigeon population control programs already operating in each city, meaning the sample reflects colonies already under human management rather than a broader cross-section of pigeon populations. Fed and control colonies differed in nesting setup as well as food access, and the conclusions depend on the unfed colonies truly experiencing food scarcity, which the authors support with indirect evidence such as body weight but did not measure through food intake. Each nest was sampled only once to limit disturbance to breeding birds, though roughly one-third of pigeons rejected their nests after visits and only successfully sampled nests were included, and sex was inferred from weight patterns and known incubation timing rather than direct visual confirmation, with the paper noting that in 19 of 75 nests, the heavier bird performed the overnight shift typically associated with females. The study measured incubation behavior, not hatching success or chick survival, so links to those outcomes draw partly on earlier pigeon research. Authors also acknowledge uncertainty about how representative feral pigeons in this study are of wild or captive pigeon populations elsewhere, and they note this was not a fully controlled food deprivation study conducted in captivity, meaning conclusions about energy reserves rely on comparisons between field conditions rather than a tightly controlled laboratory setup.

Funding and Disclosures

The study was supported by funding from the Wild Animal Initiative, grant number SG24-024, awarded to author Brandon Mak. One author’s position as a research assistant was funded through this same grant. Authors declared no competing interests. Generative AI was used only for code generation during the research process, according to the paper’s disclosure statement.

Publication Details

The study, titled “When the going gets tough, the dove gets going: feral pigeons maintain nest attendance rates during food shortages with asymmetrical biparental care,” was authored by Brandon Mak, Mira Julie Chaban, Edward Drewitt, Wolfgang Weisser, and Beate Apfelbeck. Authors are affiliated with the Technical University of Munich, the University of Bristol, the University of Salzburg, and the National Museums of Kenya. The paper was published in Royal Society Open Science in 2026, volume 13, article 261123, with the DOI https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.261123.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor