[Dice]Fig1(revised)

Photo courtesy of Robert Madden

12,000-Year-Old Bone Dice Suggest Native Americans Were Gambling Long Before Anyone Else

In A Nutshell

  • Bone artifacts from Ice Age archaeological sites in Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico have been identified as dice dating back at least 12,000 years, predating the oldest known Old World examples by more than 6,000 years.
  • A Colorado State University researcher developed a four-part identification test based on 293 sets of historically documented Native American dice, ultimately confirming finds across 57 sites in 12 states.
  • Dice appeared across every major prehistoric period and 22 distinct cultural groups in western North America, pointing to an unbroken tradition spanning more than 12,000 years.
  • Researchers argue the games served a key social function, giving otherwise unconnected groups a structured, fair way to trade, share information, and build alliances.

Long before casino floors lit up the Las Vegas Strip, people on the western Great Plains were rolling dice. According to new research, they were doing it at least 12,000 years ago, placing them among the earliest known gamblers on record, predating other documented examples by thousands of years.

A study published in the journal American Antiquity has traced Native American dice, games of chance, and gambling to the final centuries of the last Ice Age. Bone artifacts matching the shape and markings of known Native American dice were recovered from sites in Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico associated with a prehistoric hunting culture called Folsom, and they predate the oldest currently known dice from the ancient Near East, the Indus Valley, and the Caucasus by more than 6,000 years. Those Old World examples date to around 3500 BC. These American artifacts are several thousand years older.

That gap matters beyond the bragging rights. Historians of mathematics have long pointed to dice as a key early step in humanity’s developing grasp of randomness and probability, ideas that underpin everything from modern statistics to insurance pricing. Ancient Native Americans may have been engaging with games of chance earlier than any other documented culture.

How Researchers Identified Prehistoric Native American Dice

Proving that ancient bone fragments are dice rather than tools or ornaments is harder than it sounds. Anthropologist Robert Madden of Colorado State University tackled the problem by turning to a landmark 1907 compendium, Games of the North American Indians, compiled by ethnographer Stewart Culin over nearly 14 years. That 809-page volume documented 293 sets of historic Native American dice from 130 tribal groups, noting that “from no tribe [do dice] appear to have been absent.”

From Culin’s records, Madden derived a four-part identification test: the object must be two-sided and non-perforated; made of wood or bone; have its two sides distinguished by markings or color; and be small enough for two or more to be held in the hand and tossed. He then spent three years searching published archaeological site reports across North America for artifacts that fit the criteria.

Across 57 sites in 12 states, he found 659 such artifacts. Most are made of bone and bear incised markings that clearly distinguish one face from the other. Together they span more than 12,000 years of North American prehistory.

ancient native american dice
Late Pleistocene (13,000 to 11,700 BP), Early Holocene (11,700 to 8,000 BP),Middle Holocene (8,000 to 2,000 BP), and Late Holocene (2,000 to 450 BP) diagnostic and probable prehistoric Native American dice: (a, d) Signal Butte, Nebraska (Middle Holocene), NMNH-A437076, NMNH-550791; (b) Agate Basin, Wyoming (Early Holocene), UW-11327; (c, f) Agate Basin, Wyoming (Late Pleistocene), UW-OA111, UW-OA448; (e, g) Lindenmeier, Colorado (Late Pleistocene), NMNH-A442165, NMNHA440429; (h) Irvine, Wyoming (Late Holocene). (Figures 1a, d, e, and g courtesy of the Division of Anthropology, Smithsonian Institution, American Museum of Natural History. Figures 1b, c, f, and h courtesy of the Department of Anthropology, University of Wyoming.) Photo courtesy of Robert Madden.

Native American Dice Appear in Every Era of Prehistoric North America

Perhaps the most telling feature of the record is its continuity. Native American dice turn up in every major prehistoric period across western North America, and at several sites they appear in multiple soil layers separated by thousands of years. At Cowboy Cave in Utah, six dice were found in two distinct strata spanning more than 6,000 years of repeated occupation. At the Agate Basin site in Wyoming, dice appear in both 12,000-year-old Folsom deposits and in layers about 2,000 years younger.

Dice also turned up across 22 distinct cultural groups, from nomadic Ice Age hunters to semi-settled farmers to full-scale agricultural societies. No single ethnic group or way of life owns this tradition. It crossed cultural lines for millennia.

Why Native American Gambling Survived 12,000 Years

Why would dice games prove so durable? Madden points to research suggesting that gambling served a genuinely useful social function. Some scholars studying prehistoric Native American gambling have argued that it functioned as a “mechanism for transcending social distance,” giving otherwise unrelated groups a structured way to meet, trade goods, share information, and build alliances. In a world where exchange normally depended on preexisting personal relationships, gambling gave strangers a neutral context for interaction.

ancient native american dice
Figure 9. Folsom diagnostic and probable Native American dice. (Figure 9a, b, d, and g: Agate Basin, Wyoming, UW-OA005,UW-OA109, UW-OA111, UW-OA448, courtesy of the Department of Anthropology, University of Wyoming. Figure 9c: Lindenmeier,Colorado, DMNS-A900.179, courtesy of the Denver Museum of Nature and Science. Figure 9e–f, h–i, k–p, r: Lindenmeier, Colorado,NMNH-A443046, NMNH-A442165, NMNH-A44890, NMNH-A441178, NMNH-A440429, NMNH-A441841; NMNH-A442122, NMNHA443755, NMNH-A443850, NMNH-A443658, NMNH-A441839, courtesy of the Division of Anthropology, Smithsonian Institution,American Museum of Natural History. Figure 9j: Lindenmeier, Colorado, CSU-7805-6, courtesy of the Department of Anthropology, Colorado State University. Figure 9q: Blackwater Draw, New Mexico; drawing by D’arcy NR Madden afer Hester (1972:Figure 9b, by Phyllis Hughes). (All photographs, except (j), are by the author). Photo courtesy of Robert Madden.

Fair odds were at the heart of it. For two groups with no shared history to sit down and wager, both sides needed confidence the game was square. That likely depended on a shared sense of fairness and repeated experience with chance. As 16th-century mathematician Gerolamo Cardano, an early pioneer of probability theory and a gambler himself, once observed: “the most fundamental principle of all in gambling is simply equal conditions.”

That ancient tradition has not disappeared. More than 250 tribal nations now operate over 500 gaming locations across the United States, according to the National Indian Gaming Commission. Researcher Jessica Cattelino has documented that tribal gaming has become a direct expression of Native sovereignty, enacted through the governmental functions that gaming operations make possible. A practice with 12,000-year-old roots now drives a major political and economic force in modern Native American life.

One unresolved wrinkle: all 57 sites with prehistoric dice are in the western half of North America, with none east of the Mississippi River, even though eastern tribes were documented playing dice games after European contact. Madden suggests gambling may have been a western tradition that spread east during colonization, carried by forced migration and displacement. It is a reasonable theory, and an open question.

Twelve thousand years of dice, from bone carvings on an Ice Age plain to billion-dollar casinos, is a long run for any human tradition. Researchers suggest that longevity was earned. Gambling may have functioned as a social tool for bringing otherwise disconnected people together, a use that, judging by the archaeological record, proved remarkably hard to give up.


Paper Notes

Limitations

Madden’s study draws exclusively on published archaeological site reports and did not include gray literature, the unpublished compliance and cultural resource management reports held in state historic preservation offices. Because those documents represent a large share of the overall archaeological record, the dataset almost certainly undercounts the true number of prehistoric Native American dice. Madden frames the findings as a reliable indicator of when and where dice appeared, not a definitive inventory. The morphological test is designed to minimize false positives, which by design produces some false negatives: artifacts that may be dice but lack sufficient documentation to confirm all four criteria are excluded. The absence of prehistoric dice from eastern North America may reflect a genuine historical pattern or an unidentified gap in the research. Four Late Pleistocene artifacts, including examples from Blackwater Draw, New Mexico, and Murray Springs, Arizona, were not available for physical examination by the author.

Funding and Disclosures

Madden’s research received no grant funding from any public, commercial, or nonprofit funding agency. No competing interests are declared.

Publication Details

Title: Probability in the Pleistocene: Origins and Antiquity of Native American Dice, Games of Chance, and Gambling | Author: Robert J. Madden, Department of Anthropology and Geography, Center for Mountain and Plains Archaeology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado | Journal: American Antiquity (2026) | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2025.10158 | Publisher: Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for American Archaeology | Open Access: Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment