music food taste

Photo by Giorgi Iremadze on Unsplash

Music Can Reach the Brain’s Taste Regions Without Any Food

In A Nutshell

  • Music during a taste made taste-related brain regions respond more strongly than taste alone.
  • Music alone, with no food, activated some of the same brain areas as sweet and sour tastes.
  • Sweet-sounding music made drinks more pleasant than silence did, though effects on sweetness were modest.
  • Only 28 adults were scanned with simple drinks, so real-world effects remain untested.

Music playing while food hits the tongue makes the brain respond more strongly to taste, according to new brain scans from Denmark. Music by itself, with no food involved, also activated some of the same brain regions that process taste.

Researchers say the results point to flavor being built by the brain, not by the tongue alone. “With brain scans, we gain a biological window into what happens when the senses interact,” said first author Alberte Baggesgaard Seeberg, a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Food Science. The work appears in Scientific Reports.

Before anyone reshuffles a dinner playlist, the details matter. The study scanned just 28 adults, tested only simple sugar and sour drinks, and saw little clear change in how strong the tastes seemed. The extra brain activity may also partly reflect the order of testing.

Brain Scans Tracked Music and Taste Together

Earlier experiments showed that sound can change how food seems. Amplifying the crunch of chips and apples made them seem crispier, and music matched to a taste, a practice called “sonic seasoning,” shifted perceived sweetness. Until now, that evidence came mostly from volunteers rating food with and without music. Brain scans let researchers watch what the brain itself was doing.

Researchers recruited 48 healthy, right-handed adults, 27 of them women, with an average age of 27.5. Technical problems early in the study left usable brain-scan data from 28 of them.

Inside the MRI machine, a small tube dripped a sugar solution or a sour solution made with citric acid onto each volunteer’s tongue. Scanner-safe headphones played one of two soundtracks. The sweet one used high pitches, smooth notes, and pleasant harmony. The sour one kept the high pitches but added sharper notes and mildly clashing harmony.

Over about an hour in the scanner, volunteers experienced music and taste together first, then taste alone and music alone. Afterward, all 48 volunteers tasted five mixtures running from fully sweet to fully sour, some with the soundtracks playing and some in silence, and rated each for pleasantness, sweetness, sourness, and how well the sound matched the taste.

music taste
The figure shows what happens in the brain when taste is combined with music. On the left (A), sweet taste is paired with music associated with sweetness and compared with sweet taste alone. On the right (B), the same comparison is shown for sour taste. The yellow and orange areas indicate regions where the brain responds more strongly when music and taste are experienced together. These include areas involved in processing taste and sensory signals from the mouth. The findings show that what we hear can influence how the brain processes what we taste. Credit: Seeberg et al. (2026)

Music and Taste Activate Some Shared Brain Areas

Sweet and sour tastes, and the soundtracks built to match them, lit up overlapping parts of the brain, meaning some of the same areas responded to both. A few handle touch and mouth sensation. Others, near the front of the brain, are linked to reward and pleasure.

Sweetness came with a catch. The overlap showed up when researchers compared which regions were active under each condition, but a stricter check, comparing the scans one tiny point at a time, could not confirm it. Sourness did clear that bar, barely: a patch of just three scan pixels in a touch-processing area on the right side of the brain. The authors also caution that two conditions activating one region does not prove the same nerve cells respond to both.

Pairing Music With Taste Boosted Brain Activity

Adding music raised activity in taste and mouth-sensation regions for both flavors, compared with tasting the same liquid alone. Because the music-and-taste round always came first, novelty may explain part of the boost, the authors note.

Whether the music had to match the taste was a trickier question. Sweet liquid paired with the sweet soundtrack produced more activity in hearing regions and in a taste-processing region than the same liquid with the sour soundtrack. Sour showed no such difference. Researchers read the pattern as mostly about having music playing at the same time, with a bonus from matching in the sweet condition.

Sweet Music Made Drinks More Pleasant, Not Clearly Sweeter

Ratings backed up a link between the sounds and flavors. Volunteers tied the sweet soundtrack to sweetness and the sour soundtrack to sourness and bitterness. The fit was graded: the more sugar a mixture held relative to citric acid, the better it matched the sweet soundtrack, and the reverse held for sour.

Among the 28 scanned volunteers, drinks tasted with the sweet soundtrack were rated more pleasant than the same drinks in silence, a small bump on a nine-point scale. Sweet music also edged out sour music, though not by enough to rule out chance. The authors point to a feel-good spillover, where a pleasant sound makes a drink feel more pleasant too.

Evidence that music changed taste strength was weaker. In the scanned group, music did not significantly change sweetness or sourness ratings. Only in the full group of 48 did sweet music bring higher sweetness ratings than sour music or silence, so any boost looks modest.

Researchers see uses in restaurants, cafeterias, and hospitals. “For people who are at risk of malnutrition, something as simple as music could potentially improve the eating experience,” Seeberg said. The team also expects similar results with real sweet or sour foods. Both remain hopes, not results, since the study tested simple drinks, not dinners. What the scans do show is that sound reaches brain areas involved in taste, and a sweet soundtrack made a plain drink easier to like.


Disclaimer: This article summarizes a single scientific study for general informational purposes. It is not medical, nutritional, or professional advice, and findings from a small group of volunteers may not apply to everyone. Consult a qualified professional with any health concerns.


Paper Notes

Limitations

Brain-scan data came from 28 young, right-handed adults, a fairly uniform group that the authors say limits how far the results apply to other ages, handedness, musical training, or cultural backgrounds. Effects on taste ratings appeared more clearly in the full group of 48 than in the scanned 28, which the authors read as a sign the effects are modest and that the scan analysis may have had too few volunteers to detect smaller effects. The music-and-taste round always ran before the taste-only and music-only rounds, so some of the extra activity may reflect novelty or getting used to the setup rather than a true boost from combining the two senses. Swallowing and rinsing were accounted for in the analysis, but small mouth movements may still have contributed to activity in mouth-related brain regions. Activity in the same region under two conditions does not show that the same nerve cells are involved, and confirming that would take more advanced analysis. The study also tested only sweet and sour tastes, two soundtracks, and basic sugar and citric acid solutions rather than real foods, which the authors say may partly explain the modest rating effects, since earlier “sonic seasoning” work has mostly used foods with many flavors. The study had no way to show whether any of this happens in everyday settings such as restaurants or supermarkets.

Funding and Disclosures

This project was funded by a Carlsberg Foundation Semper Ardens: Accelerate Grant awarded to Q.J.W. (CF19-0587). The authors declare no competing interests. The study was approved by the Danish Health Research Ethics Committee of the Midtjylland Region (no. 75299), and all participants gave informed consent.

Publication Details

The study, titled “Music–taste interactions enhance gustatory and sensorimotor brain activity,” was authored by Alberte B. Seeberg, Ana Teresa Lourenço Queiroga, Patricia Alves Da Mota, Henrique Miguel Fernandes, Peter Vuust, Paul Smeets, and Qian Janice Wang. The first three authors contributed equally, and Wang is the corresponding author. Affiliations include Aarhus University, the University of Copenhagen, and Wageningen University & Research. It was published in Scientific Reports, volume 16, article 27868, on June 11, 2026, after being received July 14, 2025, and accepted May 11, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-53065-7. The article is open access under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor