
(Photo by wang xi on Unsplash)
Baby Boomers’ Travel Plans Are Less Influenced by Social Media Clout, Study Finds
In A Nutshell
- Baby Boomers consistently show the weakest link between anticipated social media status and travel plans, across a study of 2,812 people in six countries.
- Millennials are most driven by online clout when it comes to unconventional spots like Cuba and Slovenia, chasing bragging rights over an off-the-radar trip.
- Gen-Z shows no measurable link between social media status and interest in visiting a mainstream destination like France.
- Gen-X, not Millennials, showed the strongest connection between social return and travel plans for conventional destinations like France and the U.S.
For millions of people, picking a vacation destination has become about more than sun, food, or relaxation. It is about what the photos will look like on Instagram. Prior research has shown that the anticipated social media status boost from posting travel content is a real and measurable force in travel planning. A new study published in Current Issues in Tourism builds on that foundation, examining whether that force hits differently depending on generation, and finding that it clearly does.
Researchers at the University of Georgia and the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign pooled data from three separate studies to examine how Baby Boomers, Gen-X, Millennials, and Gen-Z each respond to the idea that posting travel photos online will make them look cooler or more unique to their followers, and how strongly that feeling shapes their stated interest in visiting a destination. Across a sample of 2,812 respondents spanning six countries, the results reveal a generational divide across most destinations studied.
Baby Boomers consistently reported the weakest connection between social media status and travel intentions, while Millennials showed the strongest pull toward off-the-beaten-path destinations that promise a standout post, though some destination-specific exceptions exist.
Researchers Tracked Social Media Status Across Four Generations
Rather than running a single survey, the research team combined data from three distinct studies conducted between 2016 and 2021, covering Cuba, the United States, France, and Slovenia. Cuba and Slovenia were classified as unconventional destinations because they attract far fewer tourists than global heavyweights. France and the U.S. were treated as conventional, mainstream destinations based on their status as top-visited countries worldwide.
Participants had to be at least 18 years old, have a household income of $50,000 or more per year, and have recent travel experience. For the U.S. dataset, participants could qualify based on travel within the previous two years, rather than one, to account for pandemic-related disruption. Respondents were drawn from six countries, and the final pool of 2,812 participants was grouped into four generational cohorts using birth-year ranges based broadly on Pew Research Center definitions. Because the Cuba study was conducted in 2016, the Gen-Z group was not included in that portion of the analysis due to too few qualifying respondents.
Participants rated how much they agreed that posting travel photos from a given destination would make them look cool, popular, unique, or savvy on social media. Separately, they rated how likely they were to visit that destination within the next year, five years, and ten years. Researchers then compared scores across the four generations to see whether social return differed by age group, and whether its connection to stated travel intent changed by generation.
Millennials Chase Clout, Baby Boomers Barely Notice It
Across the destinations studied, Baby Boomers generally reported the lowest social return scores of any generation. Older travelers simply did not feel that posting travel photos would boost their social standing as much as younger travelers did, and that weaker feeling carried through to their actual travel plans.
Millennials, by contrast, showed the strongest connection between social media clout and stated interest in unconventional destinations. For Cuba and Slovenia, places offering a rarer travel story to post about, Millennials’ travel intentions were most heavily shaped by how impressive the trip would look online. Researchers see this as a sign that Millennials want to stand out from their peers, not just fit in with them.
Gen-Z produced an interesting exception. For France, a highly conventional destination, the connection between social return and travel intent was not statistically significant in this sample. The study found no evidence that social media status was driving Gen-Z’s interest in visiting a mainstream destination like Paris. Researchers suggest this reflects Gen-Z’s preference for novelty, with a mainstream destination offering less distinction among peers.
Gen-X also stood out. For France and the U.S., Gen-X showed the strongest measured link between social return and travel intention of any generation, ahead of Millennials in both cases. The pattern shifts depending on the destination.
Marketers May Need Generation-Specific Social Media Strategies
Destination marketing organizations and tourism businesses spend enormous amounts of money crafting campaigns designed to attract specific types of travelers, and this research suggests those campaigns need to account for generational differences in how social media status shapes interest in a destination.
For unconventional or emerging destinations, leaning into the adventure of the experience may be especially effective for attracting younger travelers, particularly Millennials, who appear to crave the bragging rights that come with an unexpected travel choice. Conventional destinations hoping to reach older travelers could use a broader mix of channels, including print and websites, alongside social campaigns. Researchers did not directly test those channels but raise them as practical directions for future marketing.
This kind of generational nuance is where the marketing payoff lies. Selling the thrill of an off-the-radar destination might resonate with a status-conscious Millennial, but that same pitch is likely to miss a Baby Boomer, who the data shows is far less swayed by how a trip will look online. Knowing the difference is what turns a broad ad budget into a targeted one.
Paper Notes
Limitations
Authors explicitly acknowledge that uneven sample sizes across generational groups represent a key limitation of the study. The Gen-Z sample in particular was smaller than the other generational groups across several datasets, which researchers note may have reduced the statistical power to detect differences in some comparisons, particularly in the Slovenia analysis. Additionally, the three datasets were collected in 2016, 2020, and 2021 respectively, not simultaneously, and therefore reflect different travel conditions and world events. For the U.S. dataset, participants could qualify based on travel within the previous two years, rather than one, to account for disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic. Researchers also note that future studies should incorporate additional factors such as travel cost, distance, and socio-cultural characteristics to better understand the full picture. Because the study measured stated travel intentions rather than completed trips or bookings, the findings reflect reported interest rather than confirmed travel behavior.
Funding and Disclosures
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Publication Details
Authors: B. Bynum Boley (Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia), Sabrina Rahman (UGA Tourism Research Lab, Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia), and Zachary A. Russell (Department of Recreation, Sport and Tourism, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign) | Journal: Current Issues in Tourism | Paper Title: “Social return and travel intentions: the moderating role of generational cohorts” | Published Online: May 7, 2026 | DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2026.2669626







