amoeba

Incendiamoeba cascadensis cell at 55ºC, scale bar 5µm. Credit: Beryl Rappaport

A California Hot Spring Amoeba Just Redrew the Heat Limits of Complex Cells

In A Nutshell

  • A newly discovered amoeba, Incendiamoeba cascadensis, divides at 145°F, the hottest temperature ever recorded for a eukaryote (any cell with a nucleus, including human cells).
  • The finding breaks a heat ceiling of 140°F that had held for decades and was assumed to be close to the limit for complex life.
  • The amoeba’s proteins carry a positive electrical charge, a trait shared with only two of the extreme heat-tolerant microbes researchers compared it to, hinting at convergent evolution.
  • Discovered in a hot spring at Lassen Volcanic National Park, the amoeba is easy to grow in a lab, giving scientists a rare, workable window into how far complex life can stretch.

A single-celled creature living in a Northern California hot spring can divide at 145 degrees Fahrenheit, hot enough to scald bare skin in seconds, breaking a temperature record scientists had never seen a complex cell top. For decades, no eukaryote, the category of cells with nuclei that includes everything from amoebas to humans, had been shown to reproduce above 140°F. That mark has just been broken by an amoeba discovered bubbling in a geothermal creek at Lassen Volcanic National Park.

Scientists have named the organism Incendiamoeba cascadensis, a nod to the Latin word for “fire” and the Cascade mountain range where it turned up. According to the study, published in the journal Cell, the amoeba divides at 63°C (about 145°F) and stays active up to 64°C. That may not sound like much on a thermometer, but it moves a boundary that had held since the 1970s.

This finding matters because complex cells have always seemed far more fragile than simple microbes when things heat up. Bacteria and archaea thrive at scorching temperatures at hydrothermal vents, one archaeon even past the standard boiling point of water, but complex cells were assumed to hit a wall much sooner, since their elaborate internal parts were thought to fall apart in extreme heat. This amoeba shows that wall is not nearly as solid as researchers believed.

Heat-Loving Amoeba Sets New Record Dividing at 145°F

Researchers collected water, sediment, and rock buildup from a tributary of Hot Springs Creek in Lassen Volcanic National Park over three years, sampling 20 spots along a stretch with near-neutral pH, unlike the park’s harsher acidic springs. Site temperatures ranged from 120°F to 149°F. To coax the amoebas out, the team added wheat berries, which fed local bacteria, which fed the bacteria-eating amoebas. Amoebas showed up within one to two weeks at 135°F and 140°F, and within three weeks at 145°F, where the culture has since stayed alive for months.

Genetic testing placed the organism in a group related to Vermamoeba vermiformis, a heat-tolerant amoeba common in hot water heaters that tops out at a far lower temperature. A search of a public database of sequences from over 31,000 environmental samples worldwide turned up matching signatures in a geothermal mat in New Zealand and Yellowstone National Park, suggesting relatives may be scattered across hot spots still waiting to be found.

To pin down its limits, the team ran growth experiments at 17 temperatures from 86°F to 147°F, tracking cultures over a week. Growth stopped below about 108°F, peaked between 131°F and 135°F, and topped out at 145°F, with none at 147°F. Researchers also used specialized microscopy to catch cells dividing after growing at 145°F, confirming the amoeba was genuinely completing cell division rather than just stretching its body.

Movement proved just as impressive. Tracking cells from 77°F to 158°F, researchers found speed peaked around 135°F, with cells actively moving, not drifting, up to 147°F. The amoeba also shapeshifted between an elongated form built for speed and a compact form for foraging, switching shape every minute and a half or so. Past its growth limit it curls into a protective cyst; cysts exposed to 158°F still recovered, though 176°F proved too much.

amoeba
Incendiamoeba cell undergoing mitosis at 63ºC. DNA is colored blue, tubulin is pink, and membrane is gray. Credit: Felix Mikus

Heat-Loving Amoeba’s Tough Cells Rely on a Protein Chemistry Trick

Once researchers confirmed how hot the amoeba could get, they wanted to know why its cells hold together. Comparing its full genome to three milder amoeba species, they found thousands of genes, over half its predicted total, absent from cooler relatives, a toolkit of heat adaptations unique to this lineage.

Gene activity comparisons at 118°F and 142°F showed which systems ramped up under heat: protein-folding machinery, DNA repair, and transport between compartments, while energy and growth were dialed down, as if the cell were reallocating resources toward survival.

Findings on protein chemistry proved most surprising. Researchers analyzed the 500 most abundant gene transcripts, a stand-in for the proteins the amoeba produces most heavily, and compared surface chemistry to other organisms, including heat-loving bacteria. The amoeba’s proteins had few “sticky” surface patches that cause clumping in heat, and were rich in positively charged amino acids and low in negatively charged ones. Among the specific organisms compared, that charge pattern showed up only in two, a heat-loving bacterium and an archaeon able to survive water up to roughly 174°F and 208°F. Researchers say that points to convergent evolution: separate branches of life independently landing on a similar chemical trick for keeping proteins stable under heat.

Predicted melting points, the temperature at which proteins are expected to fall apart, came out much higher for this amoeba than for its cooler relative, with roughly five times as many proteins predicted stable above 140°F.

Heat-Loving Amoeba Redraws the Limits of Complex Life

This amoeba, pulled from a modest stream in a national park, does more than break a temperature record. It reopens a question scientists thought mostly settled: how hot can complex life get before its basic architecture gives out. Researchers still cannot answer that, but this amoeba is easy to grow, has a fully sequenced genome, and stands as one of the most workable examples of extreme heat tolerance in a complex cell available today. The team hopes it pushes scientists to take a fresh look at other heat-tolerant organisms and how far life’s limits might stretch.


Disclaimer: This article is based on peer-reviewed research published and is intended for general informational purposes. It is not a substitute for reading the original study or for professional scientific consultation.


Paper Notes

Study Limitations

Researchers note that Incendiamoeba cascadensis cannot yet be genetically manipulated in the lab, meaning specific genes suspected of driving heat tolerance can’t be directly tested to confirm their role. Many of the organism’s unique genes remain unidentified in terms of function, and the genome assembly is not yet fully resolved at the chromosome level, which limits how thoroughly it can be compared to other species. On the protein side, the melting temperatures and structural comparisons used in the study are computer predictions rather than direct lab measurements, and would need to be experimentally confirmed. The gene activity comparison was also based on just two temperature points rather than a broader range, so a fuller picture would require testing more temperatures. The authors also note that studying how the cell’s outer membrane changes with temperature is a clear next step for future work.

Funding and Disclosures

This study acknowledges support from multiple sources, including the National Science Foundation, NASA Exobiology, the National Institutes of Health, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the European Commission, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, and the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute. The authors state they declare no competing interests. The paper also discloses that the writing team used an AI tool (Claude, Sonnet v.4.5, by Anthropic) to help write code for organizing certain data analysis scripts, and that the authors reviewed and take full responsibility for all published content.

Publication Details

This study, titled “A geothermal amoeba sets a new upper temperature limit for eukaryotes,” was authored by H. Beryl Rappaport, Natalie A. Petek-Seoane, Tomáš Týml, Jessica K. Niblo, Felix Mikus, Naomi E. Gilbert, Kurt LaButti, Godwin Ani, Ethan MacVicar, Rachel M. Shepherd, Ignacio de la Higuera, Samuel J. Lord, Gautam Dey, Gordon V. Wolfe, Omaya Dudin, Laura A. Katz, Kenneth M. Stedman, Shahar Sukenik, Kristen Skruber, Frederik Schulz, R. Dyche Mullins, and Angela M. Oliverio. It is published in the journal Cell (Volume 189, scheduled for the October 1, 2026 issue) by Elsevier Inc. The DOI is https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2026.08.043.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor