Illinois, USA, October 2020 – Rows of tanks filled with anhydrous ammonia with grain bins. Nitrogen fertilizer, corn, farm crops, food, green, grow, chemicals, hazardous, dangerous, deadly,

(© Jon - stock.adobe.com)

Bacteria Could Someday Help the Body Clear Dangerous Ammonia

In A Nutshell

  • Farming drives roughly 80 to 90 percent of human-caused ammonia emissions, which can reach people through air, water, and food.
  • A healthy liver clears ammonia, but a damaged liver lets it build up in the blood and upset gut bacteria.
  • Dialysis and drugs for dangerous ammonia buildup are costly and limited.
  • Researchers propose borrowing ammonia-eating bacteria as a future treatment, but the ideas are untested in patients.

Ammonia pollution from farms, factories, and city traffic can end up in the air people breathe, the water they drink, and the food they eat. A new scientific review links it, and the chemicals it breaks down into, to breathing trouble, digestive cancers, and liver damage, then floats an unusual fix for dangerous ammonia buildup in the blood: bacteria that live off the stuff.

Published in The Innovation Reviews, the paper pulls together existing research on where ammonia comes from and how it harms health. Ammonia also forms inside every body when protein breaks down, and a healthy liver turns it into urea, a milder substance flushed out as waste. Trouble starts when a damaged liver falls behind and ammonia piles up in the blood, which the review says can cloud thinking and disrupt movement.

Treatments for that buildup, mainly dialysis and drugs, have real limits. So the authors look to nature, where bacteria in soil and water break ammonia down for energy. Borrowing those microbes or their genes may eventually offer a more flexible and effective option, the paper argues, but its proposed strategies are still ideas, not proven treatments.

Farming Drives Most Human-Caused Ammonia Pollution

Agriculture accounts for roughly 80 to 90 percent of human-caused ammonia emissions worldwide, according to the review. Fertilizer, fish and shellfish farming, and livestock and poultry waste all release it. China, India, the United States, and Europe are named as major hotspots.

Factories, diesel vehicles running on low-quality urea, and badly managed garbage and sewage add more. Burning coal and other fuels creates gases that join farm ammonia in the air to form fine particles, which are linked to asthma, bronchitis, chronic lung disease, and heart problems. One 2015 study cited in the review tied outdoor fine particles, which ammonia helps form, to more than 5 percent of premature deaths worldwide.

Direct contact irritates the eyes and airways, and years of living near farms or industrial sites may damage the lining of the nose and mouth. In animal research cited in the review, ammonia exposure even shifted the bacteria living in the nose, with similar changes showing up in the colon, a hint that its effects reach well beyond the point of contact.

Ammonia that lands in soil can turn into nitrate, which seeps into drinking water, where the World Health Organization has set strict limits on it. Crops, especially leafy vegetables, soak up nitrate from the soil and concentrate it in the parts people eat. In infants, the body can convert nitrate into a form that keeps blood from carrying oxygen properly, a condition called blue baby syndrome. Nitrate and nitrite can also react in the stomach to form cancer-causing chemicals, and the review says long-term intake raises the risk of stomach, esophageal, and other digestive cancers. Runoff feeds algae blooms too, and their toxins can damage the liver when they reach people through water, fish, or shellfish.

ammonia
The sources of ammonia exposure in the environment were discussed. The direct and indirect toxicity of ammonia exposure to human health was emphasized. The metabolism of endogenous ammonia in the human body and the role of intestinal microbiota were also presented. The development of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and broader and more flexible engineering strategies was further explored and envisioned. Credit: Ma M.-Y., Zhu Z., Zhou Y., et al. (2026). A review of the biological toxicity effects of Ammonia exposure. The Innovation Reviews 1:100013. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.tirv.2026.100013

Liver Damage Lets Ammonia Build Up and Upset Gut Bacteria

Beyond the liver, gut bacteria pitch in with ammonia cleanup. The review describes several, including one strain that lowered ammonia in the brain and may help prevent liver-related brain problems.

When the liver is badly damaged, that cleanup system stalls, and the gut community changes along with it. In mice with chronic ammonia buildup, some bacterial groups increased while Lactobacillus, a group common in probiotics, declined. In people with cirrhosis, or liver scarring, an enzyme becomes more active and raises ammonia levels in the intestine.

Current Ammonia Treatments Are Costly and Limited

Dialysis can temporarily bring ammonia down, and a liver transplant replaces the failing organ. Both are expensive, and neither restores the gut’s bacterial balance, the review notes. Drugs have downsides too: one that rebalances gut bacteria has caused severe diarrhea in some patients, and a syrup that feeds helpful bacteria can cause dehydration when overused. Probiotics show promise in some studies, but research on the best strains is thin and the products used in studies are costly. Long treatment times leave many patients complaining, the review says.

Ammonia-Eating Bacteria Could Inspire New Gut Treatments

Certain bacteria in soil, fresh water, and oceans live off ammonia as part of nature’s nitrogen recycling. Some convert it straight into nitrogen gas, skipping byproducts tied to water pollution and health risks.

Four ideas are offered for putting this chemistry to work: using bacteria native to the gut instead of lab strains; using dead bacteria whose enzymes still work, which may ease safety worries; holding enzymes or cells in place to remove ammonia, either in the gut or in a machine outside the body; and editing the gut’s whole microbial community rather than one strain. Earlier studies cited in the review found that gut bacteria, including engineered ones, can lower ammonia inside the body, but these four strategies remain proposals.

Bacteria that nature already built to handle ammonia are a sensible place to look for better ways to treat dangerous blood buildup, though patient trials, not a literature review, will have to show whether they work.


Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and is not medical advice. It summarizes a literature review, not a clinical trial, and its proposed treatments have not been proven in patients. Anyone concerned about ammonia exposure, liver health, or any medical condition should consult a qualified health professional.


Paper Notes

Limitations

This paper is a literature review, meaning its conclusions come from summarizing and connecting other published studies rather than collecting original data. Its sources mix evidence of different strengths, including animal experiments, population studies, and research on bacterial chemistry, so linked outcomes such as digestive cancers should not be read as proof that everyday ammonia exposure directly causes them. The review does not describe how its studies were selected. Its authors point to gaps in current science, including limited research on which probiotic strains work best, a lack of validation studies for probiotic treatments, and little research on how three other ammonia-lowering drugs (sodium benzoate, carbamic acid, and arginine) affect gut bacteria. The review also notes that most research on dangerous blood ammonia has focused on causes inside the body, with far less attention to ammonia from outside exposure. The engineering strategies are described as future directions rather than tested therapies.

Funding and Disclosures

Funding came from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 32670130) and the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (grant YQ2025C033). The paper states that the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or manuscript preparation. The authors declared no competing interests.

Publication Details

Title: A review of the biological toxicity effects of Ammonia exposure. Authors: Ming-Yu Ma (Harbin Medical University), Zuobin Zhu (Xuzhou Medical University), Yunxiang Zhou (Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Huan Zhao (Zhengzhou University), and Yi-Zhou Gao (Harbin Medical University, corresponding author). Journal: The Innovation Reviews, volume 1, issue 1, article 100013 (Express Review, Microbiology). Received June 2, 2026; accepted September 14, 2026; published online September 21, 2026. DOI: 10.59717/j.tirv.2026.100013. Open access under a CC BY license.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor