Pregnant woman stretch hand to glass of wine and want to have a drink. Pregnancy and bad habits. Prenatal care and alcohol abuse.

Credit: (© Тетяна Немировська - stock.adobe.com)

Alcohol Use During Pregnancy Is Rising in the US, New Research Shows

In A Nutshell

  • Alcohol use among pregnant women in the US rose across every pattern measured between 2011 and 2024, according to a new study in JAMA.
  • Heavy drinking showed the largest relative increase of the three, up 166% over the study period.
  • Pregnant women who smoked tobacco or reported frequent mental distress showed notably higher rates of alcohol use.
  • Researchers say the recent numbers may hint at a plateau, but found no clear evidence the longer-term upward trend has reversed.

Drinking during pregnancy remains relatively uncommon in the United States, but new federal survey data suggest it has become more common since 2011, and the riskiest drinking patterns are climbing fastest of all.

A study published in JAMA tracked alcohol use among tens of thousands of pregnant women across the United States from 2011 through 2024. Current alcohol use, binge drinking, and heavy drinking all rose significantly over that period. The authors note that no amount of alcohol is established as safe during pregnancy. Binge and heavy drinking carry particularly high risks, and heavy drinking showed the largest relative increase of the three.

Researchers at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health and the University of California San Diego pulled their numbers from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a long-running phone survey run by the CDC. The findings come after several years of changing drinking patterns in the broader US population, including during the COVID-19 pandemic, although this study was not designed to determine what drove the increase among pregnant women specifically.

Pregnant Women Aged 18 to 49 Reported Rising Drinking Rates Across 33,000 Survey Responses

Investigators focused on three specific patterns among pregnant women aged 18 to 49: any current alcohol use in the past month, binge drinking (four or more drinks in one sitting), and heavy drinking (eight or more drinks in a week). These definitions come from CDC surveillance standards used specifically to track alcohol use among women.

More than 33,000 pregnant respondents to the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System provided the data, comparing two-year windows of time starting in 2011-2012 and running through 2023-2024. Non-pregnant women of the same age range served as a comparison group. Researchers adjusted for age, race, and ethnicity to make sure the upward trend held up, and it did, across all three drinking categories.

People toasting with glasses of wine
Pregnant women’s alcohol use rose over 13 years, new research shows, with heavy drinking up 166% since 2011.
(Photo by Kelsey Knight on Unsplash)

Alcohol Use During Pregnancy Climbed Sharply, Especially the Riskiest Kind

Current alcohol use among pregnant women climbed from 9.1% in 2011-2012 to a peak of 15.2% in 2021-2022, before easing slightly to 14.5% in 2023-2024, a 59% relative increase overall. Binge drinking followed a similar arc, rising to 4.6% by the end of the study period, a 77% relative jump. Heavy drinking climbed to 2.0%, a 166% relative increase, meaning the rate more than doubled and then some. The recent numbers hint at a possible plateau, though researchers found no clear evidence the trend has reversed.

Demographic patterns added texture to the numbers. Alcohol use during pregnancy was more common among women who were older, more educated, unmarried, and employed, compared with their respective counterparts. Two behavioral health factors stood out sharply: pregnant women who smoked tobacco reported current alcohol use at more than double the rate of nonsmokers (26.3% versus 11.3%), and those with frequent mental distress, defined as 14 or more poor mental health days in the past month, drank at roughly double the rate of those without such distress (22.8% versus 11.1%).

Tobacco’s connection to drinking ran deeper than simple overlap. Among pregnant women who drank at all, 68.1% of those who also smoked reported binge or heavy drinking specifically, compared with 31.3% of drinkers who didn’t smoke. That gap points to tobacco use tracking with the riskiest drinking patterns in particular, not just drinking in general.

Tobacco Use and Mental Distress Point to Where Prevention Efforts Could Focus

Two threads stand out for prevention work, according to the study’s authors. First, the tight link between tobacco and the heaviest drinking patterns suggests these habits are often showing up together, a pattern the authors say could benefit from combined screening and cessation support rather than treating alcohol and tobacco separately. Second, the tie between mental distress and drinking echoes earlier research and points to a need for prevention programs that address behavioral health broadly, not alcohol in isolation.

Several limits shape how far these numbers can be pushed. The survey wasn’t built specifically to capture the finer details of prenatal drinking, so information on timing, dose, and duration during pregnancy was limited. Response rates for phone surveys like this one tend to run low, and self-reported drinking data is generally considered an undercount, particularly during pregnancy, when stigma may push women to underreport further. Binge and heavy drinking estimates carry wider margins of error than the overall alcohol-use figures, simply because fewer women in each two-year window reported those specific patterns.

Thirteen years of data, three ways of measuring drinking, and one consistent pattern: alcohol use during pregnancy increased, with heavy drinking rising fastest.


Paper Notes

Limitations

The authors note that the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System wasn’t specifically designed to capture prenatal alcohol use, which limited their ability to assess the timing, dose, and duration of drinking during pregnancy in detail. Estimates for binge and heavy drinking carry wider confidence intervals due to smaller sample sizes within those groups. The survey also has historically low response rates, and self-reported alcohol use is likely undercounted due to stigma and social desirability concerns, which the authors note may be especially pronounced during pregnancy.

Funding and Disclosures

This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA053745 and T32 DA031099). The funder had no role in the design or conduct of the study, the collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data, the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Publication Details

The study, titled “Trends in Alcohol Consumption During Pregnancy in the US,” was authored by Emilie Bruzelius, PhD, of the Department of Epidemiology at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health; Gretchen Bandoli, PhD, of the Department of Pediatrics at the University of California San Diego; and Silvia S. Martins, MD, PhD, of the Department of Epidemiology at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. It was published in JAMA on July 27, 2026 (doi:10.1001/jama.2026.11864). The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data used in this analysis are de-identified and publicly available; the study was classified as non-human subjects research by the Columbia University Institutional Review Board under 45 CFR 46.102(e).

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor