Man with back pain

(Photo by voronaman on Shutterstock)

Chronic Back Pain Alters How The Brain Processes Sound

In A Nutshell

  • People with chronic back pain find ordinary aversive sounds far more distressing than pain-free people do, more so than even direct physical pressure.
  • Brain scans show overactivity in sound-processing and emotional brain regions, alongside reduced activity in areas tied to self-regulation.
  • Back pain patients’ brain responses during auditory stimulation matched patterns previously identified only in fibromyalgia patients, suggesting shared mechanisms across chronic pain conditions.
  • A talk-based treatment called Pain Reprocessing Therapy partially eased this heightened sensitivity, indicating the brain’s amplified state may be reversible.

For most people, the sound of a knife dragging across a plate is unpleasant but forgettable. For someone with chronic back pain, that same noise can feel almost physically unbearable, and brain imaging now shows why.

A new study published in Annals of Neurology found that people with chronic back pain rated ordinary aversive sounds as dramatically more distressing than pain-free people did. What made the finding particularly telling? The gap between the two groups was bigger for sound than for direct physical pressure applied to the thumb. When sensitivity to noise outpaces sensitivity to touch, the most logical explanation is that something is happening inside the brain itself, not in the tissues of the back.

More than 600 million people worldwide live with chronic back pain, and in most cases no structural injury explains it. Researchers have long suspected that in those cases, chronic pain reflects changes in how the brain processes sensory signals, amplifying them in ways that no longer reflect real tissue injury. This study adds to that picture, showing the brain’s heightened state reaches well beyond pain and into how it processes the entire sensory environment.

Why Chronic Back Pain Makes Everyday Sounds Feel Unbearable

Researchers at the University of Colorado and the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf recruited 142 adults with chronic back pain and 51 pain-free adults matched for age and gender. Inside an MRI scanner, participants listened to two intensity levels of an unpleasant sound, a recording of a knife moving across glass, and had pressure applied to their left thumbnails at two intensity levels. After each stimulus, they rated how unpleasant the experience felt on a scale from 0 to 100.

Back pain patients rated the sounds as far more unpleasant than controls did, and the worse their self-reported back pain had been in the week before scanning, the more distressing they found the sounds. Ongoing pain and sound sensitivity weren’t separate experiences; they tracked together.

Brain imaging revealed the mechanism behind it. Patients showed overactivity in the primary auditory cortex, the brain’s main sound-processing center, and in the insula, a structure that integrates sensory signals and assigns emotional weight to experiences. Both areas fired more intensely in response to sounds in pain patients than in pain-free controls. Two default mode network regions, areas of the brain tied to self-awareness and emotional regulation, showed reduced activity in back pain patients. Their dampened responses may reflect a weakened capacity to turn down the volume on distressing input, which helps explain why sounds land so much harder.

Man trying to work on balcony distracted by noise pollution in city
Back pain patients rated the sounds as far more unpleasant than others. (Image by Elizaveta Galitckaia on Shutterstock)

How Chronic Back Pain Shares a Brain Signature With Fibromyalgia

One of the more arresting findings involved a condition that on the surface has little to do with back pain. Researchers applied brain activity patterns previously developed from fibromyalgia patients, a condition defined by widespread pain and full-body sensory sensitivity, to the back pain data. Back pain patients showed elevated expression of those fibromyalgia-linked patterns during auditory stimulation.

Prior fibromyalgia research had already identified the insula as a central driver of sensory reactivity across multiple stimuli, with enhanced insular responses linked to clinical pain intensity. In this study, insula activity in response to sounds tracked directly with how much back pain participants reported in the preceding week. Sound sensitivity and back pain, the data suggest, may reflect related brain mechanisms seen across several chronic pain conditions rather than being unique to any single diagnosis.

A Talk Therapy That Eases Chronic Back Pain’s Grip on the Senses

After the initial scanning session, participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: Pain Reprocessing Therapy (PRT), an open-label placebo injection of saline, or continuation of their usual care.

PRT is a psychological treatment built on the premise that in most chronic back pain cases, pain signals are generated by the brain rather than by real tissue damage. Over four weeks, participants attended one telehealth medical session and eight talk therapy sessions aimed at helping them reframe how they interpret those signals, using techniques designed to help the brain recognize the perceived threat is not real.

At follow-up scanning, those who received PRT reported significantly less distress in response to low-intensity sounds compared to the placebo group. PRT was also associated with increased activity in the brain regions tied to emotional regulation, consistent with a partial restoration of the brain’s capacity to manage aversive input. Effect sizes were modest, and the trial was not designed primarily to assess sound sensitivity, but the direction of change was clear.

Most people with chronic back pain have been told at some point that nothing is structurally wrong with them. Brain imaging increasingly makes clear that doesn’t necessarily mean nothing is wrong. The brain has changed, and with it, the entire sensory environment.


Disclaimer: This article is based on published research and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice. Anyone experiencing chronic pain should consult a qualified healthcare provider.


Paper Notes

Study Limitations

Each participant completed only 10 trials per condition during scanning, which may limit the reliability of individual-level brain measurements. The chronic back pain group was predominantly white and college-educated, reducing how broadly the findings may apply to more diverse populations. Treatment effects were modest, with p-values primarily in the 0.01 to 0.05 range, and more statistically robust results would increase confidence in the conclusions. Variability in pressure delivery, including differences in thumb anatomy and possible participant movement during scanning, may have contributed to weaker results in that modality compared to the standardized auditory stimulation.

Funding and Disclosures

This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health through grants R01 DA035484 (National Institute on Drug Abuse), R01 MH076136 (National Institute of Mental Health), and TL1-TR-002386 (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences). Lead author Yoni K. Ashar has received consulting fees from the Pain Reprocessing Therapy Center, Lin Health, and Mental Health Partners of Boulder County. All other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Publication Details

Title: “Auditory Hyperresponsivity in Chronic Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Pain Reprocessing Therapy” Authors: Alina E. C. Panzel, MSc; Christian Büchel, MD; Andrew Leroux, PhD; Tor D. Wager, PhD; Yoni K. Ashar, PhD Journal: Annals of Neurology (2026) DOI: 10.1002/ana.78183 Trial Identifier: NCT03294148 Affiliations: Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Max Planck School of Cognition, Leipzig; School of Public Health and Division of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply

1 Comment

  1. David Coles says:

    The sound sensitivity that I suffer from is called misophonia. Could the sound sensitivity that you correlate with back pain also be defined as misophonia? My misophonia is also correlated to my vestibular migraines.