crystal examination

Chimp Toti attentively observes the quartz crystal during Experiment 1. (Credit: García-Ruiz et al., 2026)

Chimpanzees Hoard Crystals Just Like Our Ancestors Did. Scientists Think They Know Why

In A Nutshell

  • Chimpanzees consistently chose crystals over ordinary rocks and pebbles, mirroring a collecting behavior seen in human ancestors nearly 800,000 years ago.
  • Transparency and geometric shape appear to be the key attractors, two properties that have almost no parallel anywhere else in the natural world.
  • The shared response across humans and chimps points to a perceptual pull rooted in primate biology, not culture.
  • Researchers suggest this ancient fascination with crystals may have helped spark the earliest forms of symbolic thinking in early humans.

Nearly 800,000 years ago, long before religion, art, or philosophy, human ancestors were picking up crystals and carrying them home. Not as tools. Not as weapons. Not as ornaments. Just kept, and apparently treasured. A new study published in Frontiers in Psychology suggests the answer to why has less to do with culture than with something far older: primate biology.

When researchers gave chimpanzees access to the same kinds of crystals ancient humans collected, the animals responded almost identically. They ignored nearby rocks. They sorted crystals out of mixed piles of pebbles in seconds. One chimp held a small quartz crystal inches from his eye for more than 15 minutes, rotating it slowly, studying the light. Another kept a large crystal for two days and refused to give it up until researchers offered a ransom of bananas and yogurt.

If chimpanzees, who split from the human lineage roughly six to seven million years ago, share this pull with modern people, it suggests the fascination may stem from perceptual tendencies shared across primates. And according to the researchers, it may have done more than drive ancient collecting. It may have lit the earliest spark of symbolic thought.

Why Humans Have Been Collecting Crystals for Nearly a Million Years

Excavations at China’s Zhoukoudian site turned up 20 quartz crystals alongside Homo erectus remains dated to at least 600,000 years ago, possibly more than 800,000. Other sites in India, Austria, and South Africa show the same pattern. Early modern humans in what is now the Kalahari Desert were collecting calcite crystals 105,000 years ago.

None show evidence of being carved, sharpened, or worn. Researchers have long read this as one of the earliest signs of symbolic thinking, placing value on an object for reasons beyond survival. The question is why crystals, specifically, triggered that response, and whether it predates humans entirely.

large crystal
‘The Monolith’ used in experiment 1 is an elongated quartz crystal weighing 3.3 kg and 35 cm in height. (Credit: Aden Kahr)

What Nine Chimpanzees Revealed About Crystal Attraction

To find out, a team led by Juan Manuel García-Ruiz of the Donostia International Physics Center in Spain worked with nine adult chimpanzees at the Rainfer sanctuary near Madrid. Two social groups. No prior exposure to crystals.

In the first experiment, a large transparent quartz crystal and a similarly sized sandstone rock were mounted on separate pedestals in the outdoor enclosure. Cameras ran all day. All five chimps in one group interacted with the crystal repeatedly. None gave the rock more than a passing glance. The alpha female pried the crystal loose and carried it inside. Getting it back took hours and the animals’ favorite foods.

Follow-up experiments scattered crystals, including transparent quartz, translucent calcite, and shiny metallic pyrite cubes, into piles of roughly 20 ordinary pebbles. Every time, the chimps pulled the crystals out and left the pebbles behind. One chimp, Guillermo, did it using his mouth in seconds. Another, Sandy, went further: after collecting items from several piles, she sorted everything into two groups on a wooden platform, pebbles on one side, all three crystals on the other.

Geometry, Transparency, and the Primate Pull Toward Crystals

Two properties kept emerging as attractors: shape and transparency. When opaque and transparent crystals were both available, the chimps took both. When well-formed crystals were mixed with rounded, polished quartz without flat faces, they again took both. Neither property alone explains the behavior. Both seem to matter.

As the researchers write, euhedral objects, meaning those with clearly defined flat faces, have almost no parallel in the natural world. Aside from crystals, straight lines and precise geometric shapes are largely absent from nature. In a savannah world built almost entirely on curves, a crystal was a genuine anomaly. Sharp angles, flat faces, precise symmetry, none of it existed anywhere else in nature.

Transparency was equally strange. Water is about the only naturally transparent thing ancient humans regularly encountered, which may explain why the Greek word for crystal, “cryos,” translates roughly as super-frozen water. A stone that looked like water but stayed solid was, in the early hominin world, unlike anything else.

Chimp Yvan made the fascination with light concrete. After pulling a small quartz crystal from a pebble pile, he held it inches from his eye for more than 15 minutes, rotating it repeatedly. Sanctuary staff confirmed he had no vision problems. Researchers took it as genuine curiosity about how light moves through solid matter.

Toti analyzing the shape of the crystal. (Credit: García-Ruiz et al., 2026)

How Crystal Collecting May Have Sparked Symbolic Thought

Researchers note that symmetrical stone tools appear much later in human history than the earliest crude stone tools, with a notable leap in precision around 500,000 years ago, roughly when crystal collecting became widespread. They suggest that repeated encounters with crystal geometry might have helped early hominins notice and reproduce patterns, though the study cannot test that idea directly.

What it does argue is that crystals may have been among the first objects to prompt hominins to value something for reasons beyond survival. That capacity is widely considered the foundation of symbolic thought, and by extension, of art, ritual, and religion.

If wild apes show the same response in future studies, the roots of symbolic thought may run much deeper, and much further back, than most researchers have assumed.


Paper Notes

Limitations

The study involved only nine semi-captive adult chimpanzees at a single sanctuary in Spain, too small a sample for definitive conclusions. Most came from circuses and had been raised among humans, making them already familiar with manufactured objects featuring straight lines, flat surfaces, and transparent materials. That prior exposure meaningfully distinguishes them from wild chimpanzees. Researchers were also unable to fully replicate each experiment across both groups due to logistical constraints, and individual personality differences among the chimps were present but not formally measured.

Funding and Disclosures

Financial support came from the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) through support to lead author Juan Manuel García-Ruiz; a Juan de la Cierva postdoctoral grant awarded to Tomás de la Rosa, financed by MICIU/AEI and the European Social Fund (FSE+); and a postdoctoral grant from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) awarded to Irene Delval. Authors declared no conflicts of interest. Generative AI was not used in the preparation of the manuscript.

Publication Details

Authors: Juan Manuel García-Ruiz (Donostia International Physics Center, San Sebastián, Spain), Tomás de la Rosa (University of Cádiz; CIBERSAM, Instituto de Salud Carlos III; INiBICA, Cádiz, Spain), Irene Delval (Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil), Guillermo Bustelo (Rainfer, Madrid, Spain) | Journal: Frontiers in Psychology | Paper title: “On the origin of our fascination with crystals” | Published: March 4, 2026 | DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1633599 | Citation: García-Ruiz JM, de la Rosa T, Delval I and Bustelo G (2026) On the origin of our fascination with crystals. Front. Psychol. 17:1633599. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1633599

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply

2 Comments

  1. MiddlePillar says:

    As I sit here looking at all the crystals around my living room I am suddenly feeling the overwhelming desire for a banana.

  2. MiddlePillar says:

    As