ALS on Chalkboard. 3D Illustration.

(© tashatuvango - stock.adobe.com)

This Blood Molecule Predicts How Fast ALS Will Progress

In A Nutshell

  • Blood tests revealed that a group of molecules called N-acyl taurines, or NATs, run higher in ALS patients whose disease is progressing quickly.
  • Researchers suspect the NAT rise is the body’s own compensatory attempt to fight back against the disease, not a harmful byproduct.
  • A drug called PF-04457845 that boosts NAT signaling further extended survival and preserved motor function in mice with ALS.
  • The compound has only been tested in cells and mice so far, not in human ALS patients.

ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease, is characterized by awful, progressively worsening symptoms and no cure. However, a team of researchers in Japan says it may have found a potential path toward new treatment options, and it started with something as ordinary as a blood sample. Their new paper points to a compound that slowed ALS progression when tested in mice, and the path to it began with a strange pattern hiding in patients’ blood.

ALS damages the nerve cells controlling muscle movement. Over time, patients lose muscle strength and eventually the ability to move, swallow, and breathe on their own. There is no cure, and current treatments only modestly slow the disease for most patients. Doctors have also noticed that ALS patients often burn through calories abnormally fast and develop blood sugar problems even before major symptoms set in, hints that something is off with the body’s metabolism well beyond the nerves themselves. That backdrop helped motivate this research team’s decision to dig into patients’ blood chemistry.

This study, published in the journal JCI Insight, worked backward in a clever way. Instead of starting with a drug and testing it on patients, the researchers started with signals already present in the blood of people living with ALS, then used those clues to guide a search for compounds worth testing.

Higher Levels of One Blood Molecule Signal Faster ALS Decline

Researchers compared blood samples from ALS patients whose disease was progressing quickly with samples from patients whose disease was progressing more slowly. One group of molecules stood out: N-acyl taurines, or NATs, showed up at higher levels in patients with faster-progressing disease, and those levels tracked closely with both quicker functional decline and shorter survival.

Here is where the story gets a little counterintuitive. Higher NAT levels tracked with worse disease, but the researchers came to suspect that the rise was not the problem itself. NATs belong to a signaling network in the body called the expanded endocannabinoid system, and the team’s working theory is that the increase might be the body’s attempt to push back against the disease, a compensatory response that simply is not strong enough on its own. That idea, rather than treating NATs as a straightforward villain, shaped everything that came next.

A team affiliated with several institutions in Japan carried out the research, including Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, and the Sohyaku Innovative Research Division of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. The paper’s corresponding authors, Masahisa Katsuno and Daisuke Ito, are based in the Department of Neurology at Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine.

als motor neurons
Microscope images comparing motor neurons (stained brown) in mouse spinal cord tissue. The mouse treated with PF-04457845 (right) retains more motor neurons than the untreated mouse (left). Credit:
Daisuke Ito (modified from Ito et al., JCI Insight, 2026, CC BY 4.0)

PF-04457845 Extended Survival in Mice With ALS

Blood findings helped researchers narrow their focus to several metabolic pathways, with NAT signaling standing out as the most promising lead. From there, they screened 29 compounds capable of influencing those pathways, testing each one in lab-grown cells carrying ALS-linked mutations. One compound, PF-04457845, emerged as a standout performer. It works by blocking an enzyme called FAAH, which normally breaks NATs down, so blocking it pushes NAT levels even higher.

That result lines up with the compensatory theory: boost the body’s own defense mechanism instead of suppressing it. Researchers then moved to motor neurons grown from stem cells donated by three ALS patients, watching the cells under a microscope for signs of health, like intact nerve fibers and low levels of cell damage. The compound preserved those signs of health compared with untreated cells. Finally, they tested it in mice bred to develop ALS-like disease, giving the compound daily for weeks and tracking survival, grip strength, and balance, a standard early step before any treatment can be considered for human trials.

According to the study, mice given the compound lived longer and kept more muscle strength than untreated mice. The results suggest the blood signal may reflect a biological pathway that researchers can influence with treatment, though the compound has not been tested in human ALS patients.

A Compound Worth Watching, Not Yet a Treatment

ALS research has struggled for decades to produce treatments that meaningfully change how long or how well patients live, with riluzole and edaravone, the two approved drugs, offering only modest benefit. A study like this does not hand patients a new drug tomorrow, and it would be misleading to suggest otherwise. What it does offer is a working example of how a blood-based clue in real patients can lead to a lab experiment that turns up a compound worth studying further. For a disease with so few treatment options, even an early finding like this deserves to be watched as it moves through the research pipeline.


Disclaimer: This article summarizes findings from a peer-reviewed animal and cellular study. It is not medical advice, and the compound described has not been tested in human ALS patients. Anyone with questions about ALS treatment should speak with a qualified healthcare provider.


Paper Notes

Limitations

This research combined an observational study of ALS patients’ blood with experiments in mice and lab-grown cells, so the therapeutic findings come from animal and cellular models rather than human trials. The human portion involved a discovery group of 26 people with sporadic ALS and 10 healthy volunteers, along with a separate replication group of 55 people with ALS and 25 healthy volunteers, used to confirm the blood findings held up in a second, larger set of patients. Because the drug itself was only tested in mice and in cells, including motor neurons grown from ALS patients’ own stem cells, its safety and effectiveness in human patients remain unknown.

Funding and Disclosures

The study received funding from Japanese research agencies including JSPS KAKENHI and AMED, as well as from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. Two of the paper’s authors are employees of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, and Nagoya University has filed a patent related to the findings that lists three of the paper’s authors as coinventors.

Publication Details

The paper is titled “Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Inhibition for Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis” and was published in JCI Insight in 2026. Corresponding authors are Masahisa Katsuno and Daisuke Ito of the Department of Neurology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan. Contributing institutions listed include Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine and its Institute for Advanced Research, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine and its Department of Neural iPSC Research Institute for Medical Science of Aging, and the Sohyaku Innovative Research Division of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. The article’s DOI is https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.198842.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor