20250709_HSC_Dr_Shetty

In Shetty’s lab, researchers develop an innovative nasal spray targeting brain aging. (Credit: Texas A&M University Division of Marketing and Communications)

In A Nutshell

  • Researchers delivered tiny biological particles through the nose of aging mice, calming chronic brain inflammation linked to memory decline.
  • Treated mice outperformed untreated peers on two standard memory tests, both of which rely on a healthy hippocampus.
  • Two specific RNA molecules inside the particles appear responsible for shutting down the brain’s key inflammatory alarm systems.
  • The therapy is still in early animal testing, but its noninvasive delivery method makes it a promising candidate for future human research.

What if slowing the mental fog of aging didn’t require surgery or a fistful of pills, but a simple squirt up the nose? A new study in mice found that tiny biological particles, delivered through the nasal passages, can quiet the brain’s inflammatory machinery and improve performance on memory tests in aging animals. It’s early-stage research, but it points toward what could one day become a noninvasive therapy for the kind of forgetfulness and mental sluggishness that creep in with age.

Published in the Journal of Extracellular Vesicles, the research zeroed in on a type of chronic, low-grade brain inflammation scientists have nicknamed “neuroinflammaging.” This isn’t the swelling that flares when you catch a cold. It’s a quiet, persistent burn concentrated in the hippocampus, the brain region responsible for learning and memory. Over time, it damages brain cells, ramps up harmful chemical stress, and disrupts the tiny energy factories inside cells. Researchers increasingly see it as a driving force behind the cognitive decline many people experience as they age.

Led by Ashok K. Shetty at Texas A&M University’s Institute for Regenerative Medicine, the team tested whether delivering microscopic therapeutic packages through the nose could calm that inflammation before it causes lasting harm. Their tool of choice was nano-sized bubbles naturally released by human neural stem cells, packed with molecules thought to help reduce inflammation and support brain cells. Scientists call these bubbles extracellular vesicles, or EVs, tiny packets cells use to send messages and molecular cargo to one another.

How a Nasal Spray for Brain Aging Could Bypass the Brain’s Defenses

Delivering drugs to the brain is notoriously hard because most substances are blocked by the blood-brain barrier, the selective gatekeeper that shields brain tissue. Nasal delivery sidesteps that obstacle. Within six hours of a single dose, labeled EVs were detected across multiple brain regions and taken up by microglia, the brain’s resident immune cells, as well as neurons and other key cell types. Importantly, the treatment did not reduce the total number of microglia, indicating the therapy was reshaping their behavior rather than depleting them.

nasal spray infographic
Could a nasal spray slow brain aging? New mouse research shows stem cell particles calmed inflammation and improved memory scores. (Image generated by StudyFinds)

Testing a Nasal Spray for Brain Aging in Middle-Aged Mice

Researchers used 131 mice, both male and female. Late middle-aged mice at 18 months old, roughly equivalent to a 60-year-old human, received either two nasal doses of EVs or a placebo spaced two weeks apart. A month after the last treatment, the animals underwent memory tests, then their brains were collected for analysis.

Treated mice showed significantly less swelling in brain cells associated with inflammation, and clusters of activated immune cells dropped sharply in both sexes. Chemical damage was measurably lower, while the brain’s own protective defenses were boosted. Genes responsible for cellular energy production increased their activity after treatment, a sign the therapy helped restore the metabolic function that falters in aging brains. On the memory tests, treated animals outperformed untreated peers on two well-established tasks involving object recognition and location, both of which depend on a healthy hippocampus.

Turning Down Two Inflammatory Alarm Systems in the Aging Brain

Two molecular pathways drew particular attention. First, a protein assembly called the NLRP3 inflammasome, essentially a molecular alarm system that floods the area with inflammatory signals when triggered, gets stuck in the “on” position in aging brains. Treated mice showed lower levels of virtually every protein in this chain. Second, the cGAS-STING system, a separate alarm that responds to damaged DNA by generating more inflammation, also became chronically overactive with age. Treated mice showed reduced activity there as well.

To identify which molecules inside the EVs were responsible, researchers engineered versions with one small RNA molecule removed at a time. Removing a molecule called miR-30e-3p caused the EVs to lose most of their ability to suppress the first alarm system. Removing miR-181a-5p left them unable to shut down the second. These two RNA molecules appear to be the active ingredients, not just bystanders.

A genetic analysis of individual brain immune cells, conducted seven days after a single dose, showed treated animals had increased activity in energy-related genes and reduced activity in inflammatory ones. That analysis was based on one male mouse per group, a very small sample that limits how broadly those specific findings can be applied independently, though the pattern aligned with the protein-level results from larger groups.

What Comes Next

None of this means a nasal spray for age-related cognitive decline is close to a pharmacy shelf. This is a mouse study, and therapies that work in rodents frequently fail in people. The optimal dose for aged brains is also unknown, and long-term durability of the effects has not been tested.

Still, the results spanning behavior, cell biology, protein chemistry, and gene-level analysis paint a consistent picture. Rather than broadly suppressing the immune system, the EV therapy appears to selectively reprogram the brain’s own immune cells toward a healthier, more energy-efficient state without reducing their numbers. If the approach eventually translates to humans, a prospect requiring extensive further study, it could offer a different strategy for preserving cognition with age.


Disclaimer: This article is based on a preclinical study conducted in mice and does not constitute medical advice. Animal research findings do not always translate to humans. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making any health-related decisions.


Paper Notes

Limitations

The study carries several caveats. Most notably, the single-cell genetic analysis was performed on brain immune cells from only one male mouse per group, a very small sample that limits how broadly those findings can be applied independently. The researchers acknowledge this, noting the sequencing results are supported by protein-level and gene expression analyses from larger groups. Animal groups for long-term studies included 30 to 31 mice per treatment condition across both sexes, though some individual analyses used subgroups of six to eight animals. The study was conducted entirely in mice, and translation to the larger human brain remains an open question. Only one dose level was examined, selected based on earlier work in a different mouse model using young animals, so the optimal dose for aged brains is not yet established. Long-term durability of the effects was also not assessed.

Funding and Disclosures

This study was supported by grants from the National Institute on Aging (R01AG075440 and 1RF1AG074256 to Ashok K. Shetty). The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Publication Details

The study was authored by Leelavathi N. Madhu, Maheedhar Kodali, Shama Rao, Sahithi Attaluri, Raghavendra Upadhya, Goutham Shankar, Bing Shuai, Yogish Somayaji, Shruthi V. Ganesh, Vignesh S. Kumar, Jeswin E. James, Padmashri A. Shetty, Avery LeMaire, Xiaolan Rao, James J. Cai, and Ashok K. Shetty. Madhu and Kodali contributed equally. Authors are affiliated with the Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics at Texas A&M University Naresh Vashisht College of Medicine, and the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences at Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine, both in College Station, Texas. Published in the Journal of Extracellular Vesicles (2026, Volume 15, e70232), DOI: 10.1002/jev2.70232. Received May 30, 2025; revised December 6, 2025; accepted January 13, 2026. Corresponding author: Ashok K. Shetty ([email protected]). Published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment