Near-death experiences can be life-altering. (© Günter Reuter - stock.adobe.com)
Table of contents
In A Nutshell
- Near-death experiences can feel like touching eternity, but coming back often breaks earthly bonds.
- One in five experiencers report losing friends, family closeness, or even marriages after their return.
- Validation, not therapy alone, makes the biggest difference in recovery and reintegration.
- Doctors still get it wrong: most lack training to support people shaken by what they saw “on the other side.”
- For many, it takes years to merge two worlds — the peace they glimpsed and the life they returned to.
CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. — Sarah’s heart stopped for three minutes during surgery. When she came back, everything felt different, just not in the way anyone expected.
She returned from what felt like unconditional love, only to find she could not connect with her own husband. The trivial concerns of daily life felt meaningless. Her marriage ended within two years.
Sarah isn’t alone. A new University of Virginia study finds that near-death experiences often bring deep spiritual shifts and can reduce fear of death. They can also strain the closest relationships and leave experiencers feeling isolated in a world that suddenly feels hard to relate to.
Published in Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, the research surveyed 167 people who had near-death experiences. These are episodes reported by people close to death that can include leaving the body, meeting deceased loved ones, or feeling overwhelming peace. Prior work suggests that roughly one in six critically ill patients report such experiences, so they are not rare.

Relationships Under Strain
More than one in five participants said their relationships with family, friends, or people in general got worse after the experience. Another 22% reported a divorce or breakup.
“My NDE was considerable; I know I’ll never be the same person ever, so ongoing reflection and inner work are needed daily,” one participant shared. Another called it a “double-edged sword,” wanting to share insights to ease others’ fear of death yet fearing judgment.
Experiencers often describe major value shifts. Nearly 70% reported changes in religious or spiritual beliefs and new views about survival after death. Many changed their lifestyle or daily activities. More than a third changed jobs or occupations entirely.
Here’s the twist: the same insights that bring peace about death can make everyday life feel distant. Some people find it harder to connect with those around them.
Coming Back From the Light
Researchers describe the period after a near-death experience as “reentry problems,” a kind of culture shock. Imagine tasting perfect peace and love, then waking to traffic, bills, and petty arguments.
Many wrestle with what one researcher called “the perceived triviality of their life or the problems they were facing before the NDE.” The sense of unconditional love becomes a sharp contrast to ordinary life. Some feel anger or depression at having returned to what felt like “home” only to find themselves back here.
“I just feel awake to reality, but alone in that knowledge,” one participant wrote.
That feeling can create isolation even among loved ones. People may lose motivation for the same day-to-day tasks, work roles, or social obligations. Changed values collide with others’ expectations, and friction grows.
Eighty-five percent said they felt a strong need to talk about their near-death experience. Fifty-five percent also said they were afraid to do so. That is a tough bind: sitting with the most important experience of your life while worrying that speaking about it could draw ridicule or the label of mental illness.
The Medical Response Problem
Those fears are not unfounded. Nearly one in five disclosures to health professionals were reported as negative, unpleasant, or harmful. Instead of validation, experiencers sometimes met dismissal or a quick pathologizing frame.
“After a few attempts, I honestly didn’t feel anyone was deep enough to handle it,” one participant wrote. “All the responses were textbook and uninspired; very disappointing.”
Another said, “My experience felt that those around me didn’t understand the magnitude of what I went through, so I didn’t think others would care either.”
Several factors predicted who sought support. People with deeper, more intense experiences were more likely to need help, likely due to stronger aftereffects. Those with prior counseling or substance-use history also reached out more often. Ongoing health problems from the event that led to the near-death experience played a role, too.
People who reported happy childhoods were less likely to need support and more likely to benefit when they did seek it. Early psychological resilience may help some navigate the shock of the experience with more confidence.
Whether support helped came down to one key ingredient: validation.
What Actually Helps
A positive first reaction mattered. Experiencers who felt believed by the first person they told were much more likely to find later support helpful. Those who connected with near-death experience organizations or online communities also reported higher satisfaction.
By contrast, sessions with mental-health professionals were often rated as less helpful than peer or community support. A lack of training leaves many experiencers without the kind of care that fits what they went through.
Sixty-four percent sought some form of professional help, therapy, or support to process the experience. Many needed help with the aftereffects of the near-death experience itself. Others wanted support with physical recovery, relationship strain, or simply making sense of what happened.
Barriers were common. Beyond fear of being labeled “crazy” or misunderstood, many felt help wasn’t available, couldn’t find someone suitable, faced financial limits, or found the topic too hard to discuss. Some were brushed off when they tried.
As one participant put it, “There really are no ‘therapies’ or support out there if we are being honest. This is not like other phenomena, addiction, abuse, posttraumatic stress disorder, with a wide patient population.”

Bridging the Understanding Gap
Dr. Bruce Greyson, one of the study’s authors and a psychiatrist, notes that the American Psychiatric Association’s diagnostic manual includes a category for “Religious or Spiritual Problems.” These are issues that may need professional attention but are not mental disorders. Near-death experiences are listed as an example.
Even so, that recognition has not become routine clinical skill. Many providers still lack training on how to respond to near-death experiences.
Older individuals in the study were more likely to find support helpful. Childhood experiences may be uniquely hard, since kids often lack the framework to understand what happened and may fear not being believed.
Organizations like the International Association for Near-Death Studies offer peer groups and education. Many participants found these helpful. Some also found that quiet reflection, meditation, or time in nature supported them.
Integration can take years. For many, it is a long process of holding two realities at once: the love and meaning felt near death and the ordinary world that rarely measures up.
The authors call for better training for professionals, specialized support systems, and studies that test which approaches actually help. They also note clear parallels with other intense experiences, including those brought on by psychedelics, which may raise similar integration challenges.
As one participant wrote, the experience can offer deep insight into consciousness, death, and meaning, but at a cost many don’t expect: feeling like a stranger in your own life, even to those who love you most.
Disclaimer: This article is for general information and should not be taken as medical or mental-health advice. If you’re struggling after a near-death or other life-changing experience, please seek support from a qualified professional or a peer group such as the International Association for Near-Death Studies.
Paper Summary
Methodology
Researchers conducted an online survey with 167 individuals who reported having near-death experiences. Participants were recruited through organizations focused on near-death experience education and support, particularly the International Association for Near-Death Studies, as well as through social media and Facebook groups. To qualify for the study, participants needed to score at least 7 on the Near-Death Experience Scale, a validated 16-item questionnaire that measures the depth and characteristics of near-death experiences. The survey included 79 items covering demographics, personal background, the circumstances and content of the near-death experience, aftereffects, difficulties experienced, support sought, barriers to seeking help, and communications about the experience. Participants ranged in age from 18 to 82 years old at the time of the study, with their near-death experiences having occurred anywhere from 0 to 75 years prior. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors that predicted whether participants sought support and whether they found that support helpful.
Results
Sixty-four percent of participants reported seeking support to help process their near-death experience, with 78% of those who sought support finding it somewhat or very helpful. Several predictors of seeking support emerged: having a deeper, more intense near-death experience; experiencing more aftereffects; having ongoing health problems from the event that caused the near-death experience; having a history of prior psychological counseling or substance abuse; reporting unusual stress at the time of the near-death experience; and lacking a happy childhood. For the helpfulness of support, key predictors included receiving a positive reaction from the first person told about the experience, receiving support from near-death experience organizations or online sources, reporting good current mental health, having a happy childhood, and being older at the time of the near-death experience. Support from mental health or health professionals was associated with lower perceived helpfulness. Common barriers to seeking support included fear of being thought crazy, fear of not being believed, feeling that help wasn’t available, and inability to find appropriate help. Major challenges after near-death experiences included changes in religious or spiritual beliefs (70%), deteriorated relationships (22%), divorce or relationship breakups (22%), ongoing health problems (30%), and difficulty discussing the experience.
Limitations
Several important limitations stem from the study’s exploratory, retrospective, and correlational design. Researchers could not measure mental health immediately before and after the near-death experience, preventing direct assessment of how different types of support contributed to improvements over time. When participants sought multiple sources of support, researchers couldn’t evaluate the unique helpfulness of each individual type. The sample was recruited primarily through near-death experience organizations and online communities, meaning participants likely differ from experiencers who don’t engage with such groups, which potentially limits generalizability. The exploratory nature means the findings are preliminary, and the researchers call for future preregistered studies with larger and more diversely recruited samples to validate and extend these results. Additionally, the subjective nature of near-death experiences and varied interpretations by both experiencers and researchers present inherent challenges for systematic study.
Funding and Disclosures
The research was made possible through support from John N. Migliaccio. The authors reported no actual or potential financial, personal, or other conflicts of interest in conducting the work. The study was approved by the University of Virginia’s Institutional Review Board for Social and Behavioral Sciences (Protocol No. 2377).
Publication Information
Pehlivanova, M., McNally, K. C., Funk, S., & Greyson, B. (2025). Support needs after a near-death experience: “A quantitative study with experiencers,” published in Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice. Advance online publication. DOI: /10.1037/cns0000439







