Older man jogging and running on treadmill

Man jogging on the treadmill (© Svitlana - stock.adobe.com)

Could the Right Workout Help Protect Against Dementia? New Study Points to Sleep as the Key Connection

In A Nutshell

  • A new study finds that both light and vigorous exercise are linked to fewer sleep disruptions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment, but vigorous activity showed the strongest benefit.
  • Moderate exercise showed no statistically clear connection to better sleep in this group, contradicting what prior research found in younger adults.
  • Poor sleep is closely tied to dementia risk, making this finding potentially significant for the estimated 12 million Americans currently living with mild cognitive impairment.
  • The findings are preliminary, based on just seven participants, but researchers say the results point to a need for larger, targeted exercise studies in this population.

Millions of older Americans are caught in a frustrating cycle. Early memory problems disrupt sleep, and poor sleep has been linked to faster cognitive decline. Breaking that cycle may come down to something as simple as how hard they work out. A small but notable study published in Digital Health out of Texas A&M University finds that both light and vigorous physical activity are linked to fewer sleep disruptions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment, with high-intensity exercise showing the greatest benefit.

Mild cognitive impairment is the stage between normal aging and dementia, where memory and thinking begin to slip but not enough to derail daily life. People with the condition already sleep about 34 minutes less per night than their peers, take longer to fall asleep, and wake more often during the night. As the population ages, the number of Americans living with the condition is projected to grow dramatically in coming decades, making the question of how to improve their sleep increasingly urgent.

Researchers have studied the exercise-sleep connection before, but the findings have long been contradictory. Some studies favor light activity like walking or stretching. Others point to moderate workouts like jogging. A few suggest that vigorous exercise can actually make sleep worse. This study, which tracked real-world movement using a wearable sensor rather than self-reported surveys, adds a new layer to that picture, and the results surprised the researchers.

Residents With Early Memory Loss Wore a Smart Ring 24/7 for Two Weeks

Researchers recruited 15 residents from a long-term care facility in southern Mississippi. To qualify, participants had to be over 60 and score between 18 and 25 on a standard cognitive screening test indicating mild cognitive impairment. People were excluded for serious communication difficulties, physical limitations preventing independent living, or current use of medications for sleep disorders or dementia.

After screening, 11 participants met the criteria. Each was fitted with an Oura Ring, a titanium wearable packed with sensors tracking movement, heart rate, and skin temperature. Participants could not view their own readings, which helped prevent them from changing behavior based on what the ring recorded. “Most previous studies on sleep issues with this group relied on self-reported surveys, which can be problematic for participants with cognitive impairment,” said study co-author Jungjoo Lee. “We used a more objective measurement.”

Over 14 days, the team visited twice weekly for brief check-ins, syncing data and recharging batteries. Four participants withdrew because of ring discomfort, dementia-related care, sleep-related care, or other health issues, leaving seven people in the final analysis. Ages ranged from 73 to 92, with an average age of about 83.

Older couple running outside
Study links vigorous and light exercise to better sleep in older adults with early memory loss. Moderate activity showed no benefit. (Photo by PeopleImages.com – Yuri A on Shutterstock)

Rather than relying on participants to self-report their workouts, the ring sorted every second of movement into one of three intensity categories based on energy output. Light activity covered things like casual walking; moderate covered efforts like cycling; vigorous covered running or interval training. Those are examples of intensity levels, not specific activities the study directly tested. Sleep disruption was measured by flagging any five-minute window where sensor-detected movement coincided with changes in heart rate or skin temperature, compiled into a single score covering nighttime sleep and daytime naps.

Vigorous activity showed the strongest association: each additional second was linked to a 0.18-second decrease in sleep disruption. Light activity also helped reduce disruptions, though the effect was smaller. Moderate activity showed no statistically clear connection. “We found that high-intensity exercise is the best way to improve sleep for these older adults,” said co-author Junhyoung Kim. “For every extra second of vigorous activity, sleep disruptions dropped by nearly a fifth of a second.”

Why the ‘Moderate Exercise Is Best’ Rule May Not Apply Here

Prior research on younger adults has generally pointed to moderate exercise as the sweet spot for sleep improvement, with some studies suggesting vigorous exercise could actually backfire and worsen sleep quality. For older adults with early memory problems, this study points in a different direction, though the sample is too small to draw firm conclusions. The authors suggest the relationship between exercise intensity and sleep may differ meaningfully by age group and cognitive status, a distinction that prior research has largely overlooked.

For researchers, getting this right carries real urgency. “The number of older adults with mild cognitive impairment in the United States alone is projected to grow a whopping 76 percent — to more than 21 million people — by 2060,” Kim noted. “Tailored exercise programs like group walking clubs or swimming lessons could be practical, fun and long-lasting ways for these older adults to prolong their quality of life.” With only seven participants enrolled, no firm recommendations can yet be made, but the direction is clear enough to make larger, well-designed multi-site trials a pressing next step.


Disclaimer: This article is based on a small observational study and should not be taken as medical advice. The findings are preliminary and have not been replicated in larger trials. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making any changes to your exercise routine or sleep care.


Paper Notes

Limitations

Only seven participants completed the full study period, which substantially limits the statistical power of the findings. A post hoc power analysis estimated that approximately 9 to 18 participants would be needed to achieve adequate statistical power depending on the variable being examined, and the current design provided only moderate power for the light activity association and low power for vigorous activity and heart rate variability effects. Physical activity was grouped into broad intensity categories without distinguishing between types of exercise or the time of day activity occurred, both of which could influence sleep outcomes. Sleep disturbance was treated as a single composite score combining nighttime sleep and daytime naps, making it impossible to separate what drives disruption at different times. No formal calibration period was implemented before data collection began, despite Oura documentation recommending approximately two weeks for reliable metrics. Potential confounders including chronic health conditions, medications, mood symptoms, and differences in residential setting were not fully accounted for. Future studies should use larger, multi-site samples with longer follow-up periods and randomized comparison groups.

Funding and Disclosures

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, or publication of this article. No conflicts of interest were declared.

Publication Details

Authors: Jungjoo Lee (Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Center for Community Health and Aging, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University) and Junhyoung Kim (Department of Health Behavior, Center for Community Health and Aging, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University). Journal: Digital Health, Volume 12, pages 1-10. Title: ‘Smart ring-based assessment of physical activity intensity and sleep disturbances in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.’ DOI: 10.1177/20552076261427868. All study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB #23-1035). The study is described as based on secondary data analysis.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment