Time is money

Time and money don't always need to go hand-in-hand. (© Nikolai Sorokin – stock.adobe.com)

In A Nutshell

  • People who focus on the time they’ve invested in a goal are more likely to bounce back after failure than those who dwell on money lost.
  • Across five studies with 775 participants, time-focused individuals showed greater resilience and emotional recovery.
  • Time thinking reinforces feelings of autonomy, competence, and connection, which are key drivers of long-term motivation.
  • Even so, repeated failures or extremely high investments can wear down this advantage over time.

BINGHAMTON, N.Y. — The next time a fitness goal falls flat or a DIY project goes sideways, there’s a surprisingly simple way to bounce back: stop counting the cost and start counting the hours.

New research reveals that people who focus on the time they’ve invested in pursuing a goal are far more likely to persist after failure than those who dwell on their financial losses. Even better, thinking about time makes setbacks feel less devastating emotionally.

The study published in the Journal of Consumer Marketing tested this idea across five experiments, including scenarios involving imaginary furniture-building disasters, app development failures, and real-world academic struggles. In every case, the same pattern emerged: time thinking builds resilience while money thinking breeds defeat.

Researchers say that rather than falling victim to the “sunk cost fallacy” – throwing good money after bad – humans actually respond very differently to temporal versus financial investments when facing obstacles.

How Researchers Tested Time vs. Money Mindsets

The research team, led by SUNY Binghamton professor Subimal Chatterjee, tested their theory with 775 participants across multiple studies. The first experiment involved 400 adults who imagined attempting to build a DIY coffee table. Half were told they’d spent $75 on tools, while the other half imagined investing five hours watching instructional videos. When both groups then pictured their project failing spectacularly – crooked legs, wobbly surfaces – those focused on their time investment showed stronger determination to tackle future DIY projects.

The second study pushed further, examining what happens with repeated failures. Among participants primed to think about money, failing twice instead of once caused a dramatic drop in motivation. But those thinking about time maintained their resolve even after multiple setbacks.

One of the most compelling tests involved 75 Taiwanese university students who had actually failed mandatory English proficiency exams. These weren’t hypothetical scenarios – students had invested substantial time and up to $1,650 preparing for tests they needed to pass for graduation. Those asked to reflect on their study hours reported feeling less upset about failing compared to students who focused on their financial losses.

Older man tired, upset, exhausted on stairs outside office
Researchers say that focusing on the time you lost on a failed project is far more likely to get you back on your feet than focusing on the money. (© djoronimo – stock.adobe.com)

Why Time Thinking Boosts Motivation After Failure

The explanation centers on what researchers call self-determination – essentially, feeling in control, capable, and connected to others with similar goals. Time-focused thinking strengthens all three of these mental pillars in ways that money-focused thinking cannot.

When people reflect on hours spent rather than dollars spent, they view their efforts as personally meaningful choices rather than external transactions. Time feels intimately connected to identity in ways that money simply doesn’t. Unlike cash that gets exchanged with strangers in impersonal deals, time gets reserved for activities and people that truly matter.

Hours spent learning guitar create bonds with fellow musicians; time invested in fitness connects people to health-conscious communities. Money thinking, by contrast, triggers cold cost-benefit calculations that often lead straight to quitting. Financial losses feel external and transactional, failing to tap into the deeper psychological needs that fuel long-term persistence.

When Time’s Protective Power Fails

The protective power of time-focused thinking has limits. Across all studies, researchers found this mental advantage began fading after multiple failures. Two consecutive setbacks were enough to crush money-focused participants’ motivation, while time-focused people stayed strong. But even temporal thinking lost its protective effect after three or more failures.

Repeated defeats eventually overwhelm psychological resources regardless of mental framing. The research also revealed that extremely high investment – whether time or money – reduces the difference between the two approaches. When participants rated their investment as exceptionally valuable, both time and money thinking produced similar results.

What This Means for Your Personal Goals

These insights offer a concrete strategy for anyone struggling with personal objectives. Instead of tallying gym membership fees or music lesson costs, focusing on hours already invested provides the psychological fuel needed to continue after inevitable setbacks.

For businesses, the research points toward marketing messages that emphasize time commitment over financial investment. Companies selling challenging products – from fitness equipment to educational courses – might see better customer retention by highlighting the hours people invest in learning new skills rather than the money they spend on materials.

The workplace applications are equally clear. Project teams facing obstacles might benefit more from discussions about collective time invested rather than budget considerations alone.

Rather than viewing failure through the lens of financial loss – which triggers detachment and cost-cutting instincts – the research shows that temporal framing connects to fundamental human needs for autonomy, competence, and connection. When the next setback hits, the path forward might be as simple as asking “How many hours have I put into this?” instead of “How much money did this cost me?

Disclaimer: This article summarizes findings from peer-reviewed academic research. While the results are based on carefully controlled studies, individual experiences may vary. The study does not suggest time-focused thinking guarantees success but highlights its psychological benefits in recovery from failure.

Paper Summary

Methodology

The researchers conducted three separate studies to test whether thinking about time versus money affects how people respond to failure. Study 1 involved 400 adults from the online platform Prolific (average age 40, roughly equal gender split) who imagined building a DIY coffee table after either spending $75 on tools or 5 hours watching training videos, then imagined failing at the task. Study 2 was split into two parts with 200 participants each, testing the effects of one versus two failures among people primed to think about either money (Study 2A) or time (Study 2B). Study 3 examined 75 Taiwanese university students (52% female) who had actually failed mandatory English proficiency tests and were asked to reflect on either the time or money they had invested in test preparation.

Results

Across all studies, participants who focused on time showed greater persistence and self-determination after failure compared to those who focused on money. In Study 1, time-focused participants scored higher on self-determination measures and expressed more willingness to try future DIY projects. Study 2 found that while money-focused participants showed drops in determination after two failures versus one, time-focused participants maintained their resolve. Study 3 revealed that students thinking about time felt less unhappy about test failure than those thinking about money, though this effect diminished after three or more attempts. The researchers found that self-determination mediated the relationship between time/money focus and goal persistence.

Limitations

The researchers acknowledged several limitations. The studies used priming techniques that may have limited real-world applicability since people typically invest both time and money in goals. The research focused primarily on failure scenarios and didn’t extensively examine how repeated successes might affect the time/money distinction. The sample in Study 3 was relatively small and culturally specific (Taiwanese students). Additionally, the researchers noted that an excessive focus on intrinsic motivation (triggered by time thinking) could potentially lead to harmful self-blame if people attribute failures to personal inadequacies rather than specific actions.

Funding and Disclosures

The paper does not explicitly mention funding sources or conflicts of interest. The research was conducted by faculty from academic institutions including Binghamton University, State University of New York at Oneonta, and Amazon.com Inc.

Publication Information

The study “Trying but failing: the role of time and money in enhancing self-determination, increasing goal persistence, and reducing unhappiness” was published in the Journal of Consumer Marketing, Volume 42, Number 5, 2025, pages 689-701. The paper was received in May 2023, underwent multiple revisions through March 2025, and was accepted in April 2025. The authors are Subimal Chatterjee and Debjit Gupta from Binghamton University, Chien-Wei (Wilson) Lin from SUNY Oneonta, and Jinfeng (Jenny) Jiao from Amazon.com Inc.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment