Solar,System,-,Mars.,It,Is,The,Fourth,Planet,From

Mars and the sun. Credit: NASA images on Shutterstock

Solar Wind Waves Are Ripping Chunks of Mars’s Atmosphere Into Space

In A Nutshell

  • Scientists caught Mars losing atmosphere in intense, short-lived bursts called plasma clouds, driven by a wave process similar to wind rippling across water.
  • Two spacecraft, NASA’s MAVEN and China’s Tianwen-1, monitored the solar wind and Mars’s upper atmosphere at the same time, something no single mission had done before.
  • These bursts packed 10 to 100 times more escaping gas than Mars’s two previously known steady escape channels, though their total contribution to atmospheric loss is still unknown.
  • The clouds turned out to be far smaller than earlier estimates suggested, and they occur mainly on one side of the planet depending on the solar wind’s direction.

Mars is losing its atmosphere, and scientists have just caught one of the more dramatic ways it happens. Concentrated clouds of charged gas, born from a wave pattern familiar to anyone who has watched wind ripple across a lake, are hurling chunks of the Martian atmosphere into space in short, intense bursts. Researchers used two spacecraft watching Mars at once to catch these bursts in the act and pin down, for the first time, roughly how big they are.

Solar wind, the constant stream of charged particles blowing off the Sun, strips gas from Mars over time through several processes. Scientists already understood two steady pathways: a dayside plume where ions get flung outward from the top of the atmosphere, and a nightside channel where ions get swept into Mars’s magnetic tail before drifting off into space.

This new study, published in the journal Science Advances, adds a third: short bursts called plasma clouds, generated by something called the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, that pack 10 to 100 times more escaping gas than those two steadier channels. Nobody yet knows how much that adds up to across the whole planet over time, but catching the bursts in the act is a first step toward finding out.

Two Spacecraft Confirm Plasma Clouds Form at Mars

Earlier studies had only one spacecraft to work with, which created a real problem. Scientists could see plasma clouds forming, but they had no way to check what the solar wind was doing further out at the same moment. Without that context, nobody could tell whether the clouds were triggered by disturbances arriving from the Sun or whether Mars was generating them on its own.

That changed with Tianwen-1, China’s Mars orbiter that arrived in 2021. Paired with NASA’s long-running MAVEN spacecraft, the two probes gave researchers a complete picture for the first time. While Tianwen-1 sat upstream watching the solar wind, MAVEN watched the boundary where that wind meets the Martian atmosphere. During the events described in the paper, Tianwen-1 recorded a generally steady solar wind with no major disturbances, while MAVEN simultaneously detected plasma clouds forming and escaping nearby. That let the team rule out solar wind gusts as the trigger, pointing instead to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, much like wind stirring ripples across a lake until they curl into rolling vortices at the water’s edge.

moon atmosphere
Depiction of Solar wind and electric field interacting. (Credit: Chi Zhang, Boston University)

Solar Wind Waves Trigger Mars’s Plasma Clouds

Mars lacks a strong global magnetic field, unlike Earth, so nothing deflects the solar wind before it reaches the upper atmosphere. Where the fast-moving solar wind meets the slower gas ions native to Mars, the sharp difference in speed whips up the same kind of vortex, trapping pockets of Martian ions and flinging them outward as a plasma cloud. Most carried somewhere between 1 million and 100 million ions escaping through every square centimeter each second, a patch of atmosphere roughly the size of a fingernail.

Plasma Clouds Are Smaller Than Scientists Assumed

Earlier single-spacecraft estimates suggested these clouds stretched anywhere from about 2.5 to 6 times the radius of Mars, a range too wide to calculate how much gas any single cloud carried away. With the two probes positioned about 1,900 kilometers apart during one isolated event, MAVEN detected a plasma cloud that Tianwen-1 completely missed, meaning that cloud had to be smaller than the distance separating them. That single case shows at least some plasma clouds are far more compact than earlier estimates assumed.

They also don’t happen evenly around the planet. “Instead, it is mainly observed on one side of the planet, depending on the direction of the solar wind electric field,” said lead author Chi Zhang, a research scientist at Boston University’s Center for Space Physics. That lopsidedness gives researchers another clue for predicting where and when these events are likely to strike.

Plasma Clouds May Have Shaped Mars’s Ancient Climate

Billions of years ago, Mars likely had a thicker atmosphere and liquid water on its surface. “Mars is thought to have once been potentially habitable, with a thicker atmosphere and surface liquid water,” Zhang said. “Understanding how it became the cold, dry planet we see today is important for understanding how planetary environments evolve over time.” Sunlight breaking apart atmospheric molecules currently drives most of Mars’s ongoing gas loss, but the solar wind is believed to have mattered far more in the past, when a younger, more energetic Sun blew a much stronger wind. That could have made wave-driven escape more common on early Mars, though this study did not calculate how often it happened.

Whatever the final tally turns out to be, it won’t stop at Mars. Boston University co-author Chuanfei Dong noted the same wind-driven process could play out anywhere lacking a strong magnetic field, “including some exoplanets.” NASA’s newly arrived ESCAPADE mission is expected to pick up that thread as MAVEN winds down after more than a decade at Mars.


Paper Notes

Limitations

Researchers could not determine how long individual plasma clouds last, since spacecraft cannot linger at the relevant boundary for extended stretches. Escape rate estimates depend on assumptions about cloud size, and while the two-spacecraft method constrained size in specific cases, a full statistical picture of typical cloud dimensions remains incomplete. The mathematical framework used to describe wave growth applies to a simplified model, while conditions at Mars actually involve a mix of different ion types that would need more complex modeling to capture precisely. The evidence strongly supports a wave-driven origin for these clouds, though whether the waves fully roll into vortices, or whether magnetic reconnection occurs inside them, has not been directly observed.

Funding and Disclosures

This work was supported by a NASA grant under the MAVEN project, NASA Solar System Workings grants 80NSSC23K0911 and 80NSSC24K1843, the Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship, and the IBM Einstein Fellow Fund at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton. Portions of the work involving MAVEN observations were supported by the French space agency CNES. The authors declare no competing interests.

Publication Details

Authors: Chi Zhang, Chuanfei Dong, Gangkai Poh, Jasper Halekas, Xuanye Ma, Ruhunusiri Suranga, Kathleen G. Hanley, Han-Wen Shen, Hongyang Zhou, Xinmin Li, Liang Wang, Jiawei Gao, Shannon Curry, and Christian Mazelle | Journal: Science Advances | Title: “Simultaneous Mars-orbit observations reveal Kelvin-Helmholtz instability-driven bulk atmospheric ion escape” | Published: July 31, 2026 | DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aed9072


About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment