Shoulder painful skeleton x-ray, 3D illustration.

(© yodiyim - stock.adobe.com)

In A Nutshell

• 99% of adults over 40 have rotator cuff abnormalities on MRI scans, including wear and tear (25%), partial tears (62%), or complete tears (11%)

• These findings showed up equally in pain-free and painful shoulders, with 96% of symptom-free shoulders showing damage, meaning the MRI findings often don’t explain the pain

• 78% of complete rotator cuff tears were in people with zero shoulder pain, challenging decades of medical practice that treats MRI findings as the cause of symptoms

• Researchers argue these changes represent normal aging, not disease, and suggest doctors stop using alarming terms like “tear” that imply something is broken and needs fixing

Nearly everyone over 40 has shoulder damage that would show up on an MRI scan. Yet, since it doesn’t hurt, most people have no idea.

A study scanned the shoulders of 602 randomly selected adults and found rotator cuff abnormalities in 99% of them, ranging from early wear and tear to partial fraying to complete tears. Crucially, these problems showed up just as often in people with zero shoulder pain as in those complaining of serious issues. After researchers crunched the numbers, even the worst tears had essentially no connection to whether someone’s shoulder actually hurt.

The findings, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, turn conventional medical wisdom on its head. For decades, doctors have looked at shoulder MRIs, spotted tears or signs of wear, and assumed they found the culprit behind a patient’s pain. Treatments followed: physical therapy, cortisone shots, even surgery. But if nearly everyone walking around has these same “abnormalities,” calling them abnormal stops making sense.

Led by orthopedic surgeon Thomas Ibounig at Helsinki University Hospital, the study recruited everyday Finns from a long-running national health survey: not people already seeking treatment for shoulder problems. Each person underwent a thorough shoulder exam, filled out questionnaires about pain and function, and underwent high-powered MRI scans of both shoulders. The median age was 58, and the group split evenly between men and women.

Rotator Cuff Damage Was Everywhere

When radiologists analyzed the scans, damage appeared almost universally. About 25% of participants showed early signs of tendon wear and tear. Another 62% had partial tears, akin to a rope that’s fraying but not completely snapped. And 11% had full tears, where the tendon had ripped all the way through.

Age drove the numbers up. Nobody under 45 had a complete tear, but by age 70 and beyond, 28% did. Partial tears started showing up in people’s 40s and became the norm by their mid-50s. Men and women had tears at basically the same rates.

Among more than 1,000 pain-free shoulders, 96% showed some kind of rotator cuff problem on MRI. Among painful shoulders, 98% did. Early wear and partial tears appeared at identical rates whether the shoulder hurt or not.

Complete tears did seem more common in painful shoulders at first glance: 15% versus 7% in pain-free shoulders. But when researchers accounted for other factors like arthritis in the shoulder joint or problems with nearby tendons, even that difference disappeared. The final analysis showed less than a 1% gap, basically statistical noise.

Perhaps the most telling finding: of 96 complete tears identified in the study, 75 were in people who felt no shoulder pain whatsoever.

The findings suggest rotator cuff tears are far more common, and painless in many people, than currently believed. (Image by Tumisu from Pixabay)

When Everyone Has It, What Does It Mean?

Shoulder pain ranks as the third most common musculoskeletal complaint in primary care, affecting up to 31% of people in any given month. When patients show up hurting, about half get sent for MRI scans, and up to 82% of doctors consider imaging essential for diagnosis.

Once the MRI comes back showing tears or degeneration, the treatment machine kicks into gear. Three-quarters of patients get referred to physical therapy. Imaging-guided cortisone injections have exploded 46-fold since 2000 in some places. Rotator cuff repair surgeries have doubled to septupled across high-income countries in recent decades.

But there’s a math problem with diagnosing based on findings that appear in virtually everyone. When 99% of people over 50 have rotator cuff changes, spotting one on MRI tells doctors almost nothing useful. A positive scan doesn’t prove what’s causing the pain unless something else points to it, like a recent injury, sudden loss of strength, or specific exam findings that fit.

Ibounig and his colleagues argue that the medical field needs to rethink its language. Calling these findings “tears” implies something broke that needs fixing. It suggests trauma, damage, disease. But if 96% of pain-free middle-aged shoulders have them, maybe they’re just normal aging, like gray hair or wrinkles, but for tendons.

The researchers suggest different terms: fraying, wear, changes, degeneration. Words that describe what’s happening without the alarm bells. Less dramatic language might ease patient anxiety about their bodies falling apart. It could also help doctors and patients have more honest conversations about whether imaging or aggressive treatment actually makes sense.

The research isn’t the first to find a disconnect between shoulder scans and symptoms, but it’s the most rigorous. Previous studies were smaller, often focused on people already in pain, or used less advanced imaging. A 2018 review of 56 studies found no consistent link between imaging findings and symptoms, but most of that research had quality problems.

Three earlier population studies found similar patterns. A small Australian study of 30 older adults found 43% had partial tears and 20% had complete tears. British researchers scanning 463 women in their 60s and 70s found 34% with partial tears and 11% with complete tears. A Japanese study of 683 village residents found 17% with complete tears. But none matched the scale or rigor of the Finnish work.

For anyone over 40 dealing with shoulder pain, the message is both reassuring and frustrating. Reassuring because that “tear” on your MRI probably isn’t as serious as it sounds: most people have them and feel fine. Frustrating because it means figuring out what’s actually causing the pain becomes harder. The scan that was supposed to provide answers might just be showing normal aging that has nothing to do with why you’re hurting.

The bigger question is what medicine does with this information. If rotator cuff findings are essentially normal after middle age, why are we still scanning so many shoulders and operating based on what we find? Ibounig and his team argue their findings should prompt doctors to question whether routine imaging helps patients or just leads to overtreating incidental findings that would never cause problems.

At minimum, the study suggests patients and doctors should view shoulder MRI results with healthy skepticism. That tear might be there. It might look impressive on the scan. But odds are good it’s been there for years, causing zero problems, and treating it won’t fix whatever’s actually wrong.


Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read in this article. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or 911 immediately.


Paper Notes

Limitations

The research used standard MRI rather than magnetic resonance arthrography, which involves injecting contrast dye into the joint for clearer images. However, studies show regular MRI works just as well for spotting rotator cuff tears, and the invasive dye procedure isn’t practical or ethical for research on healthy volunteers. Because participants came from the general population rather than orthopedic clinics, the study likely captured milder problems than what specialists typically see. Large tears were uncommon, limiting conclusions about severe cases. The age range of 41 to 76 means results may not apply to younger people, where tears more often result from acute injuries rather than gradual wear. Participants needed to speak Finnish or Swedish, potentially limiting how well findings apply to other ethnic groups.

Funding and Disclosures

The Academy of Finland (grant 316061), Social Insurance Institution of Finland (KELA, 63/26/2018), state funding for university-level health research in Finland (TYH2020213), and Helsinki University Research Fund (WBS47087321) supported the study. Dr. Ibounig serves on the Finnish Society for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery board and owns stock in Osgenic. Dr. Järvinen received institutional grants from Finnish state university health research funding. Dr. Bensch sits on the Nordic Forum for Trauma and Emergency Radiology board. Drs. Björkenheim and Rämö own Osgenic stock; Dr. Rämö also serves on the Finnish Orthopaedic Society board and receives payment for teaching trauma courses. Dr. Buchbinder received grants from Australian research organizations and earns royalties from medical writing. Dr. Taimela received grants from Finnish research institutions.

Publication Details

JAMA Internal Medicine published the study online February 16, 2026 (doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.7903). The research team included Thomas Ibounig, Teppo L.N. Järvinen, Saara Raatikainen, Tommi Härkänen, Niko Sillanpää, Frank Bensch, Ville Haapamäki, Pirjo Toivonen, Robert Björkenheim, Anssi Ryösä, Kari Kanto, Vesa Lepola, Antti Joukainen, Mika Paavola, Seppo Koskinen, Lasse Rämö, Rachelle Buchbinder, and Simo Taimela from the Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics at University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Turku University Hospital, and Monash University in Australia. Correspondence: Thomas Ibounig, Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 320, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland ([email protected]).

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment

1 Comment

  1. Ed G says:

    “96% of pain-free middle-aged shoulders have them” says nothing. As I’ve gotten older, aches and pains in many places in my body have mushroomed. The body’s coping mechanisms gradually shut down notifications of pain. That doesn’t mean the pain has gone away. It means it’s being ignored. A more valid assessment involves testing strength and range of motion. I believe many of those “pain-free” shoulders have significant impairment.