manga books

Photo by Tanya Barrow on Unsplash

Brain Scans Show Reading on Paper May Give Your Mind a Storytelling Edge Over Tablets

In A Nutshell

  • A University of Tokyo brain imaging study found that reading manga on paper, compared to a tablet, led to more efficient brain processing when readers later tried to piece the story together.
  • Accuracy scores were similar between groups, but tablet readers took measurably longer to answer harder questions that required connecting information across two story halves.
  • Brain scans showed that paper readers’ language and narrative regions worked more quietly and efficiently, while tablet readers’ brains appeared to compensate by recruiting extra resources.
  • Researchers suggest the stable, fixed layout of physical pages helps anchor story information in memory in ways a tablet’s disappearing screens may not.

For anyone who has ever curled up with a physical comic book or manga, there may be something to that experience beyond nostalgia. A new brain imaging study out of Japan found that reading manga on paper, versus on a digital tablet, produces measurably different brain activity and may affect how efficiently readers later piece together the story. According to a new brain imaging study, the format a story arrives in may shape how well the mind holds onto it.

Published in the journal PLOS ONE, the study recruited 25 Japanese-speaking university students at the University of Tokyo to read a popular manga series, split between paper books and electronic tablets. After reading, participants were placed in a brain scanner and tested on comprehension. Those who had read on paper showed signs of more efficient mental processing when they later tried to make sense of the full story, while those who read on a tablet had to work harder to pull the pieces together. Parents, teachers, and librarians have long insisted that reading on paper is somehow better, but hard neuroscientific evidence explaining why has been elusive until now.

Paper vs. Tablet: Same Story, Two Perspectives

The manga used in the study had a clever structure that made it ideal for this kind of experiment. Each story was told twice, once from the perspective of one character and again from the perspective of another. Participants read the first half of each story either on a physical paper book or on a Microsoft Surface tablet before entering the MRI scanner. Inside the scanner, they read the second half on a screen and rated how much they felt for the characters as they read along. Then came a round of questions.

Questions fell into two groups. The first could be answered using only the first half. The second required readers to combine information from both halves. This design isolated a specific mental task: stitching together two different perspectives into one coherent understanding of what happened.

All 25 participants were native Japanese speakers, mostly undergraduate or graduate students around 23 years old. About half regularly read manga, averaging around two hours per week.

manga brain
Brain scans revealed differences in how readers processed manga stories depending on whether they first read on paper or on a tablet. Row (a) shows activity during story-related questions, row (b) during manga reading later inside the scanner, and row (c) highlights regions involved more strongly in the active comprehension task of answering the questions. Participants who first read on paper showed reduced activity in key frontal language regions. (Credit: ©2026 Sakai et al. CC-BY-ND)

What Brain Scans Reveal About Paper vs. Digital Reading

Accuracy rates were similar between the paper and tablet groups. But the time it took to answer the harder, two-part questions was notably longer for those who had read the first half on a tablet. When researchers looked at only correct answers, they found a clear gap in response times for the tablet group on those harder questions, with no such gap for the paper group.

The brain scans added another layer. The MRI data focused on two regions at the front of the brain involved in language and narrative integration, the mental work of putting pieces of a story together. For paper readers, these regions were quieter during both manga reading and when answering the simpler questions. That quietness is generally interpreted as a sign of more efficient processing: the brain is not straining to reconstruct what happened because the earlier paper reading had apparently done a better job of anchoring the story in memory. For the harder questions, paper readers did show increased activity in these regions, suggesting the demanding task engaged them meaningfully, just from a stronger starting point.

For tablet readers, those same brain regions lit up more intensely, especially the left-side area, when answering the harder questions. Regarding the right-side region, the more active it was in tablet readers, the better they tended to perform. The brain appeared to be compensating, recruiting extra resources to make up for a weaker foundation laid during tablet reading.

Why Physical Pages May Give the Brain a Head Start

Researchers point to a specific quality of physical books that digital devices offer less of: the stable, predictable layout of pages. When reading manga on paper, each double-page spread stays fixed. A reader can feel how far through the book they are and use the consistent layout as a kind of mental map. These cues, the authors suggest, help the brain anchor story information more firmly in memory, making it easier to retrieve and connect later on.

None of this means tablets are ruining reading. The study involved a small, specific group of native Japanese-speaking university students working through one manga series with an unusual dual-perspective structure, and its findings may not extend to every kind of book or every kind of reader. But it adds meaningfully to the case that the format a story arrives in is not a trivial detail. How deeply it takes root, and how smoothly the brain can later stitch its threads together, may depend at least in part on whether there are real pages to turn.


Disclaimer: The findings of this study are based on a small sample of 25 native Japanese-speaking university students and a specific manga series. Results may not apply to all readers, age groups, languages, or reading formats.


Paper Notes

Limitations

The study’s sample size was 25 participants, a relatively small group, though the researchers conducted a statistical power analysis suggesting the sample was sufficient for detecting effects using brain imaging methods. All participants were native Japanese speakers and university students, which limits how broadly the findings can be applied to different age groups, languages, or reading backgrounds. The manga used had a specific dual-perspective narrative structure that is not representative of all reading material, so the results may not apply equally to other formats such as novels, textbooks, or single-perspective comics. The second halves of all stories were read on a digital screen inside the MRI scanner regardless of the preparatory condition, meaning the study measured the carry-over effects of the initial reading medium rather than direct comparisons of paper versus tablet reading in real time.

Funding and Disclosures

This research received funding from COAMIX INC, the publisher of the manga used in the study. It was also supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists (no. 24K16045) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan. The authors state that the funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, the decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could constitute a conflict of interest, while noting the funding relationship with COAMIX INC.

Publication Details

Authors: Keita Umejima, Yuki Sunada, and Kuniyoshi L. Sakai, all affiliated with the Department of Basic Science, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. Journal: PLOS ONE Paper Title: “Manga reading on paper vs. digital devices: Prospective effects on core and supportive integration processes in the brain” Published: June 3, 2026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0349778 Data Availability: Behavioral and functional imaging data are publicly available via OSF at osf.io/gxkvs.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment