
(© SergeyKatyshkin - stock.adobe.com)
Why the Date of a Psychedelic Experience May Change How People Feel About Partisan Violence
In a Nutshell
- Among nearly 22,000 US adults tracked for two months, people whose most intense psychedelic experience fell on the Fourth of July reported a drop in support for partisan violence, while those who tripped near party conventions or Election Day leaned the other way.
- A psychedelic experience on the date of the July 2024 Trump assassination attempt was also linked to lower support for partisan violence, a shift seen only among Republicans.
- The results fit the idea that psychedelics amplify a person’s surroundings, so the political mood of the day may steer the outcome more than the drug itself.
A person takes the same dose of the same psychedelic drug. On one date, the experience lines up with softer feelings about political violence. On another date, it lines up with harder ones. Nothing about the chemistry changed. Only the calendar did.
That is the odd pattern at the center of a new study in the journal Psychedelic Medicine, which tracked nearly 22,000 American adults to see whether the day someone had their most intense psychedelic experience was connected to how they felt about violence in the name of politics. Researchers found that people whose peak trip fell on the Fourth of July tended to report less support for partisan violence afterward. People whose peak trip fell during the political party conventions, or closer to Election Day, leaned the other way.
Psychedelics have long carried a reputation as drugs of peace and love, and a good deal of clinical work has pointed to their promise for treating depression. This research complicates that easy story. It hints that a psychedelic does not hand a person a fixed emotional destination. Instead, the drug may act more like an amplifier, turning up whatever mood, message, and meaning happen to surround the user at the moment.
A Fourth of July Dip in Support for Partisan Violence
Support for political violence in the United States is not a fringe worry. In a 2023 national survey the authors cite, roughly one in four American adults considered violence usually or always justified to reach a political goal. Figures like that are debated, and the paper notes that survey methods may push such estimates too high, but many researchers still treat the trend as a serious threat to American democracy. That backdrop is what makes the drug angle worth a closer look.
Psychedelics such as LSD and psilocybin sit in an unusual category. Their effects depend heavily on what scientists call “set and setting,” meaning a person’s mindset and their surroundings. A calm room and a hopeful frame of mind can steer an experience one way; a tense room and an anxious frame can steer it another. These drugs also appear to raise suggestibility, leaving users more open to the ideas and emotions in the air around them.
Study author Otto Simonsson and colleagues took that idea and scaled it up. If a single quiet room can shape a trip, they reasoned, maybe the mood of a whole country can too. The Fourth of July offered a natural test. It is a holiday built around shared national identity rather than one party beating another, so a psychedelic experience on that day might pull a person toward unity instead of division.
Inside a Two-Month Study of Naturalistic Psychedelic Use
To check the idea, the team ran a real-world observational study, closer to a natural experiment than a controlled lab test. Researchers recruited 21,990 US adults between the ages of 18 and 50 through the online platform Prolific, drawing them in two waves, one from June to September 2023 and another in June 2024, and surveyed each person again about two months after their first response. Cleverly, the study description never mentioned psychedelics, a move designed to keep drug enthusiasts from flooding in and skewing the sample.
Of that starting group, 12,345 people finished the follow-up survey, a retention rate of 56.1%. Among those who returned, 505 reported using a psychedelic during the two-month window. Just 19 of them said their most intense experience landed on the Fourth of July, while 486 pointed to some other date. Everyone answered the same questionnaire about partisan violence at both check-ins, so the researchers could measure how each person’s attitudes shifted over time.
Those numbers matter for a reason the authors stress themselves. Nineteen people is a small group, and any conclusion drawn from it deserves a cautious read. Even so, the size of the effect stood out. Compared with people whose peak trip fell on an ordinary date, those whose peak trip fell on the Fourth of July showed a clear drop in support for partisan violence. People who used no psychedelics at all also showed a decline relative to that ordinary-date group. Put plainly, the ordinary-date trippers served as the reference point and ended up relatively higher on support for partisan violence, with both the holiday group and the non-users landing below them.
Classic psychedelics counted in the study, including psilocybin, LSD, ayahuasca, DMT, mescaline, peyote, and San Pedro, all act on the same brain target, a serotonin receptor known as 2A. That shared biology is part of why the researchers could group them together and focus on timing rather than the specific substance.
When the Calendar Reversed the Effect on Partisan Violence
If the story ended at the Fourth of July, it might read as a feel-good result about holidays and open minds. It does not end there. When the team looked at other charged dates on the 2024 calendar, the direction of the pattern flipped depending on the flavor of the event.
Take the assassination attempt on Donald Trump on July 13, 2024. People whose most intense psychedelic experience fell on that day also tended to report less support for partisan violence afterward, and that dip showed up only among Republicans. A holiday of shared identity and a shocking attack on a candidate produced echoes of the same calming shift, at least in this data.
Party conventions told the opposite tale. Among people whose peak trip coincided with the Democratic or Republican National Conventions, support for partisan violence tended to rise. The same held for those who tripped on dates closer to Election Day, when partisan feeling runs hottest. On dates built around one side rallying against the other, psychedelic use lined up with more support for that division rather than less.
For the convention effect, the researchers found a possible thread. Users who had recently encountered messages painting the other party’s leaders as threats showed the strongest upward swing. When the surrounding air was thick with us-versus-them signals, the psychedelic seemed to carry those signals inward.
Why the Setting Around Psychedelics May Matter
Pull the findings together and the researchers’ reading comes into view: in their interpretation, the drug did not decide the direction, the moment did. As the authors put it, naturalistic psychedelic use “may modulate support for partisan violence in directions that depend on the political nature of the events.” A trip near fireworks and flags pointed one way. A trip near attack ads and rally chants pointed another.
That distinction carries weight because most psychedelic use today happens outside the tightly controlled conditions of a clinical trial. In a lab, a trained guide manages the set and the setting. In the wild, the setting is whatever is playing on the news, scrolling through the feed, or filling the streets. If the broader mood of a country can bend the outcome of a trip, then the growing wave of at-home psychedelic use comes with social ripples that reach well past any one person’s mental health.
A few guardrails belong on all of this. The study was observational, meaning it can spot connections but cannot prove that the timing caused the change in attitudes. The authors are blunt on the point, writing that “no conclusive causal inferences can be made.” The sample skewed heavily Democratic, the holiday group was tiny, and every answer came from people reporting on themselves, which invites the usual slippage between what people say and what they do. The researchers call for future work that randomly assigns people to a psychedelic or a placebo before drawing firmer lines.
Still, the core idea is hard to shake. Set and setting were always understood as the couch, the playlist, the trusted friend in the next chair. This work stretches the concept to the size of a nation. On the Fourth of July, that setting may have looked like a country celebrating itself. On the road to an election, it looked like a country at war with itself. Same molecule, two very different moods. Which way a person leaned afterward tracked the mood of the day more than the drug, though a study like this can point to the link without proving the cause.
Paper Notes
Limitations
Several limits shape how far these results can travel. The team used purposive sampling to catch more psychedelic users, a choice that helped fill the study but narrowed how well the results apply to the general public. The work also sits in a specific time and place, the United States in 2023 and 2024, and centers on politically charged dates. The authors point out that it would have helped to test the same idea against events in other countries, such as France’s Bastille Day, and against calmer, less political occasions in the US like Thanksgiving, but the study did not gather that data. Participants were asked directly about celebrating the Fourth of July but not about the assassination attempt, the conventions, or the election, leaving gaps in what the researchers could rule out. All the measures were self-reported and open to biases such as the urge to answer in socially approved ways, even on an anonymous survey. Attrition ran high, with 43.9% of baseline participants dropping out before follow-up. Most important, only 19 people had their most intense psychedelic experience on the Fourth of July, roughly 3.8% of the psychedelic users, a thin base that calls for caution. And because the design was observational rather than a controlled trial, the authors state plainly that no firm causal conclusions can be drawn.
Funding and Disclosures
Author Otto Simonsson was supported by the Olle Engvist Foundation and the Ekhaga Foundation. Simon B. Goldberg was supported by a grant (K23AT010879) from the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Additional support came from the University of Alabama at Birmingham, the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development, and the Building Psychological Capacity fund. Coauthor Peter S. Hendricks disclosed past paid advisory relationships with Eleusis Benefit Corporation, Reset Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Silo Pharma, and current paid advisory relationships with Bright Minds Biosciences Ltd. and Journey Colab Corporation. He is also a cofounder of Equulus Therapeutics and Mycelial Health. The remaining authors reported no competing interests. The authors thanked Caroline Swords for help with data collection. The 2024 portion of the study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework, and the anonymized data and code are posted there as well.
Publication Details
Simonsson, O., Hendricks, P. S., Osika, W., & Goldberg, S. B. (2026). Politically Salient Events May Modulate Effects of Naturalistic Psychedelic Use on Support for Partisan Violence. Psychedelic Medicine, published by Mary Ann Liebert, a part of Sage. DOI: 10.1177/28314425261444135. The authors are affiliated with the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden, Stockholm University, the University of Wisconsin–Madison, and the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Corresponding author: Otto Simonsson, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.







