
(© mozZz - stock.adobe.com)
It’s Now Far More Plausible That This Exoplanet Is Earth-Like
In A Nutshell
- Astronomers cut the estimated mass of a nearby planet nearly in half, from 5.26 to 2.3 times Earth’s mass.
- The lighter weight makes a rocky composition more plausible, though the planet’s true size and makeup are still unknown.
- Its orbit still falls in the zone where liquid water could theoretically survive, but nobody knows if the planet has an atmosphere to make that possible.
- The planet sits right on the “cosmic shoreline,” a line that may determine whether it managed to hold onto an atmosphere at all.
A planet once written off as too heavy to be Earth-like has just gotten a dramatic downgrade, and that’s good news for scientists hunting for life beyond the solar system. Astronomers have revised its estimated orbit and minimum mass, cutting the planet’s heft nearly in half. The lighter world makes a rocky composition more plausible, and its shorter orbit still falls within the zone where liquid water could theoretically survive on a surface, assuming it has one at all.
While all of that is legitimately promising, the planet also sits almost exactly on what astronomers call the cosmic shoreline, a boundary separating worlds that can hang onto an atmosphere from those stripped bare by their star’s radiation. Without an atmosphere, a well-placed planet is likely just a dead rock. Nobody yet knows which side of that line this one falls on, and that uncertainty is what has researchers so interested.
Known as GJ 3378 b, the planet orbits a small, dim red dwarf star just 25 light-years from Earth. Small stars like this are prime hunting grounds for habitable planets, since their habitable zones sit close enough in that Earth-sized worlds can be detected. Detecting a planet and understanding it are different things, though, and its true size, composition, and atmosphere remain unknown.
The Planet’s Weight Just Got Cut in Half
When scientists first announced the discovery in 2024, they pegged its minimum mass at 5.26 Earth masses, with a year of roughly 24.73 days. A new study in The Astrophysical Journal, led by astronomer Paul Robertson and colleagues, overturned those figures using a far larger pool of data from four telescopes.
Robertson’s team found a shorter period of 21.45 days and a minimum mass of just 2.3 Earth masses, roughly half the original estimate. At that lighter weight, the planet is more plausibly rocky, though its true mass could still be higher, since this method only pins down a minimum, and its radius and composition remain unknown.
Turns out, the instruments were disagreeing with each other. The 2024 announcement relied solely on SPIRou, in Hawaii. Adding three more instruments, including the Habitable-zone Planet Finder in Texas and NEID in Arizona, produced a different result: a 21.45 day period showing up in every combination of three or more instruments. That earlier signal likely traces to undiagnosed interference in the SPIRou data.
A Stellar Wobble Reveals a Faster, Lighter Orbit
Astronomers found the planet using the radial velocity method, which measures tiny wobbles in a star’s motion from an orbiting planet’s gravity. As a planet tugs on its star, the star moves toward and away from Earth in a repeating rhythm, similar to how a siren sounds higher pitched approaching and lower retreating. That shift in starlight reveals a planet’s period and minimum mass.
Behind the study sits 137 observations from the Habitable-zone Planet Finder, plus 18 from NEID, 78 from CARMENES in Spain, and 170 from SPIRou, an unusually large dataset for one star. To rule out the star itself as the source, since starspots can mimic a planetary wobble, the team checked timing against activity indicators and found no connection. That signal held steady for years across independent instruments.
Researchers also checked NASA’s TESS telescope, watching the star during four windows, for a brightness dip signaling a transit. None turned up, so the planet’s radius is still unknown.
Sitting Right on the Cosmic Shoreline
With a revised mass and orbit, the team turned to a deeper question: could this world support life? Its estimated surface temperature, assuming no atmosphere, comes in just below the freezing point of water, near the inner edge of the zone where liquid water could theoretically survive. Whether it actually does depends entirely on an atmosphere to trap heat, something nobody has measured.
Red dwarf stars like this one blast nearby planets with radiation that can strip away atmospheres over billions of years. The team calculated that the planet has absorbed roughly 48 times the radiation Earth took in from the sun over its history, placing it directly on the cosmic shoreline. As the researchers write, “the presence of an atmosphere on this world cannot be ruled out based on simple scaling relationships.” They call the metric a rough guide, meaning its status remains genuinely open.
Bigger Telescopes Will Have to Settle the Question
Whether a closer look is possible soon remains open. Even future giant ground-based telescopes, the 30-meter-class observatories now being built, would find directly studying a planet this close to its star extremely challenging. It is the kind of nearby, possibly rocky habitable-zone world astronomers say is worth characterizing carefully regardless, since it could also affect what scientists learn about any other planets that might be sharing the same system.
This planet’s story shows that revising old data can matter as much as gathering new data. A world that seemed settled in 2024 looks entirely different two years later, not because telescopes saw farther, but because researchers combined more instruments. What emerged is a lighter, closer-orbiting planet that might be rocky, sitting on a line that could decide whether it holds an atmosphere.
Paper Notes
Limitations
A key limitation of this study is that the radial velocity method provides only a minimum mass for the planet, not its true mass, because it cannot determine the angle at which the planet’s orbit is tilted relative to Earth. If the orbit is viewed at a shallow angle rather than nearly edge-on, the planet’s true mass could be considerably higher, which would affect conclusions about its composition and its ability to retain an atmosphere. Additionally, the atmosphere retention metric used to assess whether the planet could hold onto an atmosphere is described by the authors as “an interesting order-of-magnitude estimate,” meaning it provides only a rough guide, and the planet’s actual atmospheric status is highly sensitive to its true mass, radius, and precise radiation history. The team also notes that attempts to model correlated noise from stellar activity led to an overparameterized model, and that the NEID dataset did not have a long enough observation baseline in either of its two time segments to independently confirm the star’s rotation period.
Funding and Disclosures
Funding for the work came from multiple National Science Foundation grants awarded to the Habitable-zone Planet Finder instrument team, listed in the acknowledgments section of the paper. The work was also partially completed as part of NASA’s CHAMPs team, supported under NASA grant No. 80NSSC21K0905. Additional support came from the Heising-Simons Foundation via grant 2017-0494. One co-author acknowledged support from NASA under award No. 80GSFC24M0006. Observations at Kitt Peak National Observatory were conducted under proposal ID 2025A-387657.
Publication Details
Paper Title: A Revised Mass and Period for the Habitable Zone super-Earth GJ 3378 b: A Planet Straddling the Cosmic Shoreline | Authors: Paul Robertson, Michael Endl, William D. Cochran, Gudmundur Stefánsson, Suvrath Mahadevan, Caleb I. Cañas, Gogod James, Roan Arendtsz, Ryan C. Terrien, Chad F. Bender, Scott A. Diddams, Mark R. Giovinazzi, Arvind F. Gupta, Samuel Halverson, Shubham Kanodia, Daniel M. Krolikowski, Sarah E. Logsdon, Joe P. Ninan, Claire J. Rogers, Arpita Roy, and Christian Schwab | Journal: The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 1005, Article 32 | Published: June 30, 2026 (received March 9, 2026; accepted May 14, 2026) | DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae732b







