Pregnant businesswoman feeling sick at office work

(Credit: © Syda Productions - stock.adobe.com)

In a Nutshell

  • Mice given estrogen at levels similar to late pregnancy had trouble recognizing familiar objects and locations, without becoming more anxious or less active, pointing to a genuine memory problem rather than mood or motivation issues.
  • Scientists traced the problem to a group of overactive brain cells in the hypothalamus that quiet down a memory hub in the hippocampus, and switching those cells off protected mice from memory problems while switching them on caused memory problems even without extra estrogen.
  • In a study of 70 women, those with higher estrogen levels during pregnancy scored worse on memory-heavy tests, even after researchers adjusted for sleep, mood, age, and other possible explanations.

For generations, women have described a strange kind of forgetfulness during pregnancy: walking into a room and blanking on why, losing a train of thought mid-sentence, misplacing keys they just had in hand. Doctors and family members often chalk it up to stress, exhaustion, or simply “mom brain.” A new study points to something more concrete, a temporary, estrogen-driven change in how the brain’s memory signals fire.

Scientists say they’ve identified a brain circuit that may explain “pregnancy brain,” the forgetfulness millions of women report during pregnancy. In mice, high estrogen switched on a cluster of brain cells that quiet down the part of the brain responsible for forming memories. Turning those same cells off restored normal memory, while switching them on triggered memory problems even without any extra hormone.

Researchers reached that conclusion by combining mouse experiments with a study of pregnant women. In the animals, raising estrogen to late-pregnancy levels made it harder to recognize familiar objects and remember locations. In the human half, a study published in the journal Science Bulletin found that women with higher estrogen performed worse on memory tasks throughout pregnancy, even after researchers accounted for sleep, mood, age, and other factors that might explain the difference. Together, the two halves offer a biological explanation for something long dismissed as anecdotal or psychological.

How Scientists Tested Pregnancy Brain Fog in Mice

Researchers first compared pregnant mice to non-pregnant mice using a handful of standard memory tests. In one, mice explored two identical objects, then returned a day later to find one swapped for something new. Healthy mice naturally spend more time exploring the unfamiliar object because they remember the familiar one. Pregnant mice showed less interest in the new object, a sign their memory of the familiar one had faded. A similar pattern appeared in a test of spatial memory and in a maze test that tracks how well mice learn and recall their way around over several days of training.

Memory problems did not come with extra anxiety, less curiosity, or changes in movement, which ruled out the idea that the mice were simply too stressed or unmotivated to explore. Researchers also raised estrogen levels in separate, non-pregnant mice using a slow-release hormone implant, matching the levels seen during pregnancy. These mice showed the same memory struggles as the pregnant mice, and the effect faded months later as hormone levels returned to normal. That timing points to a temporary problem tied directly to how much estrogen is circulating at a given moment, not a lasting change to the brain.

Inside the Brain Circuit Behind Pregnancy Brain Fog

To find where this was happening in the brain, the team looked at the hypothalamus, the brain’s hormone control center, which has an unusually high number of estrogen-sensing proteins. Unlike the hippocampus, the brain’s memory center, which is somewhat shielded from the bloodstream, the hypothalamus sits in a spot more exposed to whatever hormones are circulating at any given moment.

Using genetic analysis of individual brain cells, researchers found that a specific type of calming brain cell in the hypothalamus carried the highest concentration of estrogen-sensing proteins. High estrogen appeared to weaken the signals that normally keep these cells in check, prompting them to fire more often. Removing the estrogen-sensing proteins from cells in this brain region protected mice from the memory problems caused by both estrogen treatment and pregnancy itself.

Brain activity recordings backed this up. Cells from pregnant and estrogen-treated mice fired more often and were easier to trigger than cells from untreated mice. These overactive cells connect directly into the hippocampus, the memory center, and when they fired more, activity there dropped, as if a noisy neighbor were drowning out its signal.

To confirm this circuit actually caused the memory trouble, rather than just being linked to it, researchers used a chemical switch technique that turns specific brain cells on or off in living mice. Silencing the overactive hypothalamus cells in estrogen-treated mice protected the animals from memory problems across multiple tests, while activating those same cells in mice that had never received extra estrogen produced memory problems anyway. Block the circuit and the problem disappears; trigger it and the problem appears: that two-way result is the strongest evidence in the paper that this hypothalamus-to-hippocampus circuit drives the memory changes tied to high estrogen.

Infographic showing how high estrogen may affect a memory-related brain circuit in mice, with possible links to pregnancy brain fog in women.
Infographic by StudyFinds

Confirming Pregnancy Brain Fog in Women

Mouse experiments only go so far, so the researchers also ran a study in people. They recruited 118 women ages 23 to 40 from hospitals in China, and 70, split evenly between pregnant and non-pregnant participants, completed testing across all three phases of the study. Researchers tested pregnant women and drew blood during each trimester to track rising hormones, while non-pregnant women completed cognitive testing on a similar timeline, with blood drawn once at the start.

Participants took a series of memory and thinking tests, including word recall, an attention test involving colors and words, and timed connect-the-dots tasks. Pregnant women performed worse than non-pregnant women on tasks that leaned heavily on straightforward memory, especially in the second and third trimesters, while scoring about the same on harder tasks involving reasoning and spatial puzzles. After isolating the effect of estrogen and accounting for sleep quality, anxiety, depression, age, education, and other factors, higher estrogen levels still lined up with worse performance on those memory-heavy tests. Researchers call the pattern “pregnancy brain” or “momnesia.”

Why Pregnancy Brain Fog Deserves to Be Taken Seriously

For years, the memory complaints reported by pregnant women, and by some who use hormonal birth control, have been treated as soft or easy to blame on stress and sleepless nights. In mice, the research draws a straight line from a specific hormone level to a specific group of brain cells to a measurable memory problem. In pregnant women, higher estrogen levels correlated with worse scores on certain memory tests, consistent with the mouse findings. It does not mean every foggy moment during pregnancy has this exact cause, and the researchers note that other factors, including other pregnancy hormones, almost certainly play a role too. But having an identifiable brain circuit means pregnancy brain fog now has a biological explanation rather than only a reputation.

Disclaimer: This research combines causal experiments in mice with an observational study of pregnant women. The brain circuit was identified and manipulated in mice; the human findings show an association between higher estrogen and weaker memory performance, not proof that the same circuit operates in women. Results in animals do not always translate to people, and the study is not medical advice. Anyone with concerns about memory during pregnancy should speak with a healthcare provider.

Paper Notes

Limitations

Researchers note several caveats. The hormone pellet used to raise estrogen levels in non-pregnant mice matched the overall magnitude of estrogen seen in pregnancy but may not fully copy the natural rise and fall of hormones during an actual pregnancy. They also acknowledge possible limitations in the hormone measurement method used in the mouse work, though they note that comparisons between the estrogen implant and pregnancy groups should still hold up even if absolute values shift slightly. The chemical-switch experiments used to silence brain cells caused a mild reduction in general movement in one test, which the researchers argue is unlikely to explain the memory improvements they saw, though they cannot be sure the effect on memory was complete, and other brain circuits may also contribute. In the human study, the pregnant group had a higher education level than the non-pregnant group, which the authors say might mean the memory impairment is actually underestimated, since more education is usually linked to better test performance. Pregnant women also reported notably worse sleep, though the link between estrogen and memory performance held up even after adjusting for sleep quality. The authors state that progesterone, another hormone that rises during pregnancy and is also present in oral contraceptives, was not examined in this study and could not be ruled out as a contributing factor.

Funding and Disclosures

Funding for the work came from the National Key Research and Development Program of China, the Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province, and multiple grants from the National Institutes of Health, along with support from the John S. Dunn Foundation, the Texas Medical Center Digestive Diseases Center, and the Gulf Coast Center for Precision Environmental Health. Additional fellowship support came from the Frank Belton Kimmel and Sandra Kimmel Endowed Post-Doctoral Fellowship and a training fellowship from the Gulf Coast Consortia. The authors state they declare no conflict of interest.

Publication Details

Paper Title: “High-level estrogen impairs memory via estrogen receptor signaling in a hypothalamic–hippocampal neural circuit”

Journal: Science Bulletin, 2026

Authors: Xin Li, Nan Zang, Qianru Zhao, Yuxiang Sun, Udhaya Kumar Siva Kumar, Mengyu Hua, Wenjun Zhou, Yanyan Qi, Hu Chen, Longqing Xia, Jun Qin, Lei Sun, Chaitra Rai, Chao Cheng, Zhandong Liu, Li Chen, Yong Xu, Zhaoyong Hu, Hongjie Li, Xinguo Hou, Yanlin He, Xianghua Zhuang, and Zheng Sun

Author Affiliations: Baylor College of Medicine, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Pennington Biomedical Research Center at Louisiana State University, and The Second Qilu Hospital of Shandong University.

The corresponding authors are Xinguo Hou, Yanlin He, Xianghua Zhuang, and Zheng Sun.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2026.08.057

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor