Participants mingling and exploring the gallery of co-created drawings at an event held six months after the last data collection. (Credit: Ryssa Moffat)
Six Weeks of Drawing With a Stranger Rewired How Their Brains Worked Together
In A Nutshell
- Strangers paired up to draw together weekly for six weeks while researchers tracked their brain activity in real time.
- Pairs of two younger adults grew more in sync the longer they drew together, while pairs of one older and one younger adult grew less in sync, an unexpected split.
- Both loneliness and social closeness improved steadily for everyone, with intergenerational pairs starting off feeling less lonely and slightly closer than same-age pairs.
- Brain activity tracked closely with how lonely or close people actually felt, showing emotional shifts can show up in measurable brain patterns.
Loneliness is becoming one of the most serious health crises of our time, with effects on the body that researchers have compared to smoking, and links to memory problems and changes in brain structure. So when scientists wondered whether pairing strangers from different generations for a shared creative activity could change how their brains interact, the question carried real weight, and the answer turned out stranger than anyone expected.
A new study published in PLOS Biology tracked what happens inside the brains of older and younger adults who draw together for the first time, then keep doing it week after week. As the pairs got to know each other, their brains synced up, but in opposite directions depending on who they were paired with, a pattern that may point to new intergenerational relationships developing differently, at a biological level, than relationships between people of the same age.
Researchers at ETH Zurich and the University of Montreal recruited strangers from Zurich, Switzerland, paired them up, and had them attend six drawing sessions over roughly six weeks. Some pairs were intergenerational, one older adult and one younger adult; others were two younger adults. At every session, scientists measured both people’s brain activity while they drew, separately and together.
Brains in Sync, But Not in the Same Way
To measure brain activity, the team used wearable devices that track blood flow through the scalp using light. Two participants wore these devices at once, letting researchers detect when both brains responded in similar patterns simultaneously, a pattern scientists call brain synchrony.
Higher synchrony during collaboration is generally seen as a sign two people are paying attention to each other and processing an interaction together. Prior research showed synchrony is greater during collaboration than solo work, and this study confirmed that for both pair types.
What shifted across six sessions was unexpected. Same-generation pairs showed increasing brain synchrony over time while drawing together. Intergenerational pairs showed the opposite: their synchrony decreased over the same period.
The Dip May Signal Comfort, Not Distance
At first, decreasing synchrony might sound like a bad sign, as though the two people are growing apart. But researchers offer a different reading, drawing on existing work about how brain synchrony behaves between strangers versus close friends.
Intergenerational pairs may begin with heightened attention and mental effort directed toward each other, given how different they might seem on the surface. As familiarity grows and that strangeness fades, the intense mutual monitoring may relax, and synchrony decreases as a result. Same-generation pairs, who likely find common ground more easily from the start, may instead grow more attuned to each other’s subtle signals over time, which drives their synchrony upward.
The Loneliness Numbers
Loneliness ticked down and social closeness climbed steadily for both groups across the six sessions, a roughly one percent drop and four percent rise with each meeting, small but consistent shifts that added up week after week. Intergenerational pairs consistently reported feeling less lonely and slightly closer to their partners than same-generation pairs did, which researchers suggest may partly come down to perspective: being around someone much older or younger might shift how lonely a person feels, perhaps by offering a different vantage point on one’s own life.
Attitudes toward other generations stayed stable throughout. Intergenerational participants tended to feel similarly close to their own generation and the other age group, while same-generation participants leaned more toward their own.
Brain Activity Mirrored How People Actually Felt
Brain data backed up what people were feeling. Partners with similar loneliness levels showed greater synchrony while drawing together and lower synchrony while drawing alone, and closer-feeling partners showed greater synchrony too, each pattern tied to a different brain region involved in attention and processing social information. Emotion, in other words, was showing up in measurable ways in the brain itself.
A Snapshot of Something Larger
This study included 122 adults from Zurich: 31 older adults, aged 69 and up, averaging 76, and 91 younger adults, aged 18 to 35, averaging 22 to 24. All started as complete strangers, with no known neurological or psychological conditions.
Each session followed the same structure: questionnaires about loneliness and feelings toward other age groups, then three drawings with oil pastels while wearing the brain-monitoring devices, one alone behind a divider and two together on the same sheet, without speaking. Afterward, participants reported how close they felt to their partner.
These findings come with real limits: they’re tied to specific brain regions, one activity, and Zurich’s cultural context, and every session involved just one pair at a time rather than the group setting of a real community program. Future research will need to test whether the pattern holds in larger groups, across cultures, and over longer stretches of time.
Disclaimer: This article is based on findings from a single peer-reviewed study and should not be taken as medical or psychological advice. The research is exploratory and does not prove that creative activities like drawing directly reduce loneliness. Anyone experiencing persistent loneliness or mental health concerns should consult a qualified healthcare provider.
Paper Notes
Limitations
Several important constraints on the findings are worth noting. Most significantly, the study lacked a same-generation group composed of two older adults, which would have been the ideal comparison group. Without it, the researchers cannot fully rule out that some differences between groups stem from age-related differences in brain function rather than purely from the generational pairing. The study also could not control for gender pairings within dyads, as the combination of different ages and genders produced too many subgroup combinations with small numbers to analyze meaningfully. Sessions were conducted with one pair at a time, which differs from real community programs that involve multiple participants simultaneously. A technical issue with one brain-monitoring device midway through data collection resulted in the exclusion of some brain data for certain sessions, particularly for one of the four brain regions studied. The researchers also note that the self-report measures used may not generalize across cultures, due to differences in how relationships form in different parts of the world. Finally, the study used a linear method to calculate brain synchrony, and the authors acknowledge that brain coordination is widely believed to involve non-linear dynamics that this method may not fully capture.
Funding and Disclosures
Two brain-monitoring devices used in the study were provided to researcher Ryssa Moffat through the Cortivision Pathfinder Program. Oil pastels used in the drawing sessions were provided by Caran D’Ache. Guillaume Dumas received support from the Institute for Data Valorization, the Fonds de recherche du Québec, and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Ryssa Moffat and Emily S. Cross receive salaries from the Social Brain Sciences Lab at ETH Zurich. The authors declare no competing interests, and the funders, with the exception of the Social Brain Sciences Lab at ETH Zurich, had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, the decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Publication Details
Authors: Ryssa Moffat, Guillaume Dumas, Emily S. Cross | Affiliations: Social Brain Sciences Lab, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; CHU Sainte-Justine Azrieli Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Montreal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Mila, Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute, Montréal, Quebec, Canada | Journal: PLOS Biology | Paper Title: Social interactions between people of same and different generations shape longitudinal changes in interpersonal neural synchrony, loneliness, and social connection | Published: August 20, 2026 | DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003899







