vaping

(Photo by JC Romero from Pexels)

In A Nutshell

  • Total days Americans under 21 spend vaping rose 337% between 2013-14 and 2022-23, more than quadrupling.
  • Past-month vaping among under-21s fell 28% after the 2018-19 peak, but vaping days fell only 13%.
  • Teens vaping daily or nearly daily made up 1.7% of all teens in 2022-23, up from 0.7% in 2016-18.
  • Adult vaping days kept climbing after the pandemic, mainly because adults who vape are doing it more often.

Vaping among Americans under 21 has cooled since a 2018-19 peak, but the total number of days they spend vaping is still more than four times what it was a decade ago. A new study in Tobacco Control found that vaping days among that age group rose 337% between 2013-14 and 2022-23. Vaping days, a measure that adds up how many days people used e-cigarettes in the past 30 days across the whole population, captures both how many people vape and how often.

Counting days of use tells a different story than a simple headcount. A hundred people who each vape once in a month add up to 100 vaping days, while 50 people who vape every day add up to 1,500, even though half as many people are vaping. Between 2013-14 and 2022-23, the estimated number of Americans ages 12 and older who reported vaping in the past month grew 45%, while the estimated total number of vaping days nationwide jumped 183%.

Underage vapers, meaning anyone under the legal purchase age of 21, accounted for about 16% of all vaping days in 2022-23. That is down from a peak of 23% in 2018-19 but well above the roughly 10% share in 2013-14. Past-month vaping in that age group fell 28% after the peak, yet vaping days fell only 13%, a gap that points to more frequent use among those who kept vaping.

Seven Rounds of National Survey Data Tracked Vaping Days for a Decade

Researchers from the University of Waterloo in Canada and Roswell Park in Buffalo, New York, drew on the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study, a national survey that has followed Americans since 2013 and added new participants in later rounds. The analysis covered seven rounds, from 2013-14 through 2022-23, and included young people ages 12 to 17 along with adults 18 and older.

Sample sizes stayed large. The first round included roughly 46,000 interviews and the last about 41,600, with participants split almost evenly between males and females and adults spread across age groups from 18 to 65 and older. Recruitment deliberately included extra adults who use tobacco, adults ages 18 to 24, and Black adults, and the results were then adjusted so they reflect the US population. In each round, respondents were asked whether they had used an electronic nicotine product, a category that includes e-cigarettes and vape pens, in the past 30 days, and those who had were asked on how many of those days. The results are national estimates of days of use, not counts of puffs or nicotine consumed.

Underage Vaping Trends Infographic
Underage vaping days rose 337% in a decade. A new study shows why fewer young vapers can still mean far more vaping. (Image by StudyFinds)

Underage Vaping Days Rose 337% Despite a Recent Drop in Teen Vaping

Vaping days rose in every age group. Among teens ages 12 to 17, they climbed 278%, from 4.5 million to 16.9 million. Young adults ages 18 to 20, old enough to be legal adults but still under the purchase age, saw the steepest increase, at 364%, while adults 21 and older saw 165%. Even so, adults 21 and older accounted for 84% of all vaping days in 2022-23.

Teens who vape daily or nearly daily, meaning at least 20 days a month, made up 1.7% of all teens in 2022-23. That is down from 2.3% at the 2018-19 peak but well above the 0.7% recorded in 2016-18.

JUUL’s rise and the spread of other nicotine salt e-liquids, a type of vaping liquid that earlier research has linked to easier inhalation and more frequent vaping, line up with the 2018-19 peak. This study did not test whether those products caused the increase. The authors also point to industry marketing aimed at young people, along with growth in the youth population, as likely contributors to the steeper climbs among teens and young adults.

Adults saw no comparable drop. Past-month vaping among adults rose from 6.2% in 2016-18 to 8.9% in 2022-23. Daily or nearly daily vaping among adults more than doubled, from 2.1% in 2016-18 to 4.4% in 2022-23, and adult vaping days kept climbing after the pandemic, mainly because of more frequent use.

Population Growth Cannot Account for the Rise in Vaping Days

Between 2018 and 2023, the US population grew only about 2%, according to Census figures the authors cited, while total vaping days were 26% higher in 2022-23 than in 2018-19, a gap population growth cannot explain.

Other national surveys found higher youth vaping rates than this one. The National Youth Tobacco Survey and Monitoring the Future are conducted in schools, possibly producing higher numbers because school-based surveys offer greater anonymity. This study surveyed households, which produced lower estimates and milder changes over time.

A smaller headcount of young vapers does not mean vaping fell as much. Counting only how many people vape shows a decline since 2018-19, while counting days shows underage use still far above where it began. Adding frequency measures to national surveys, the authors say, may improve how vaping is monitored, and they write that surveillance “remains essential for understanding the potential risks and benefits of vaping on public health.”


Disclaimer: This article summarizes one published study for general information and is not medical advice. Anyone with questions about vaping, nicotine use, or their health should speak with a qualified health care professional.


Paper Notes

Limitations

All vaping data were self-reported, which carries some risk of inaccurate answers, though earlier testing found the survey data to be highly reliable. In 2021, the pandemic changed how interviews were conducted, with 67% done by telephone and 33% self-completed, and different interview modes can change how people answer. The 2021 youth sample was also limited to ages 14 to 17 instead of 12 to 17 because the original group of participants had aged. Vaping days count days of use, not puffs, sessions, or nicotine consumed, and the study cannot show that nicotine salt products caused the changes. Results from this household-based survey also differ from school-based surveys, which report higher youth rates.

Funding and Disclosures

National Cancer Institute grant P01CA200512 supported the research. Author Makenna N Gomes is supported by an Ontario Graduate Scholarship and a Studentship Award from the Canadian Lung Association and Canadian Respiratory Research Network. The authors state that the content is solely their responsibility and does not necessarily represent the views of the funders. Author David Hammond disclosed that he has served as a paid expert witness on behalf of public health authorities in litigation involving the tobacco, vaping, and cannabis industries.

Publication Details

Titled “Trends in vaping in the US population between 2013 and 2023: changes in vaping days among youth versus adults,” the study was written by Makenna N Gomes and David Hammond of the School of Public Health Sciences at the University of Waterloo, and Cheryl Rivard, Karin A Kasza, and Andrew J Hyland of the Department of Health Behavior at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center in Buffalo, New York. It was published online ahead of print on October 20, 2026, in Tobacco Control (BMJ Group), after being received on February 19, 2026, and accepted on September 2, 2026. The paper was externally peer reviewed. DOI: 10.1136/tc-2026-060142. Correspondence: David Hammond, [email protected]. Citation: Gomes MN, Rivard C, Kasza KA, et al. Tob Control. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1136/tc-2026-060142.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor