law world environmental regulation

(Credit: Deemerwha studio/Shutterstock)

LONDON — As the world grapples with climate change and environmental calamities, a new survey is revealing a surprising shift in public opinion. It turns out that most people around the globe now want to see serious, criminal consequences for those who harm the planet.

Imagine if damaging the environment was treated like a serious crime, right up there with theft or fraud. Well, that’s exactly what a whopping 72% of people across 18 major countries want to see happen. This eye-opening finding comes from the Global Commons Survey 2024, a massive research project that took the pulse of 22,000 people across some of the world’s biggest economies.

So, what does this actually mean? Researchers are talking about making it a criminal offense for government officials or corporate executives to give the green light to actions that seriously harm nature or the climate. Think of it as putting Mother Nature under legal protection.

“The majority support (72%) for criminalizing actions which allow serious damage to the climate surprised us,” admits Owen Gaffney, who helps lead an initiative called Earth4All, in a media release.

It’s a clear signal that people are fed up with environmental destruction and want to see real accountability.

Nearly three out of four people (72%) across 18 G20 countries support making it a criminal offence for government or leaders of large businesses to approve or permit actions which cause serious damage to nature and climate
Nearly three out of four people (72%) across 18 G20 countries support making it a criminal offense for government or leaders of large businesses to approve or permit actions which cause serious damage to nature and climate (Credit: Earth4All / GCA)

Poll reveals a growing movement

This isn’t just pie-in-the-sky thinking. Some countries are already making moves in this direction. Belgium, for instance, recently made “ecocide” a federal crime. If you’re scratching your head wondering what ecocide means, think of it as a fancy term for severely damaging the environment. It’s like genocide, but for ecosystems instead of people.

Belgium isn’t alone. France and Chile have passed similar laws, while countries like Brazil, Italy, and the Netherlands are considering jumping on the bandwagon. It’s like a domino effect of environmental protection laws spreading across the globe.

worried young woman holding up a stop climate change sign
72% said they want to make it a criminal offense for government officials or corporate executives to give the green light to actions that seriously harm nature or the climate. (© Carlo – stock.adobe.com)

The survey paints a picture of a world that’s both deeply concerned about the state of our planet and hopeful for change. Here are some key findings that might raise your eyebrows:

  • Nearly 6 in 10 people (59%) are seriously worried about the current state of nature.
  • An even bigger group – 69% – think we’re approaching some scary “tipping points” for climate and nature due to human activities. These tipping points are like environmental points of no return, where damage becomes irreversible.
  • On the brighter side, 61% of people fall into groups that strongly support taking action to protect the environment.

“People everywhere are very worried about the state of our planet and they’re feeling the pain already,” says Jane Madgwick, who heads up the Global Commons Alliance.

However, Madgwick also sees a path forward, emphasizing the need for “bold leadership and a truly global effort” to tackle these challenges.

Women driving fears about climate

Interestingly, the survey found that women tend to be more concerned about environmental issues than men. They’re more worried about the state of nature today and for future generations. Women are also less likely to think that claims about environmental risks are exaggerated or that technology alone can solve our problems without lifestyle changes.

The survey also revealed some stark differences between developed and developing countries. People in countries like India, China, and Indonesia feel much more personally exposed to climate change compared to those living in Europe and the United States.

This makes sense when you think about it. Many developing countries are on the front lines of climate change, facing more frequent and severe natural disasters, rising sea levels, and extreme weather events. It’s no wonder they’re feeling the heat (literally and figuratively) more acutely.

What does all this mean for the future?

Jojo Mehta, who leads an organization called Stop Ecocide International, sees these survey results as a sign of growing momentum. She points out that we’re already seeing “significant policy shifts in favor of ecocide legislation” at various levels of government. Mehta believes this push is being driven by widespread demand from regular, everyday people.

“People clearly understand that the most severe forms of environmental destruction harm all of us,” Mehta explains.

The idea is that by making top decision-makers personally liable for environmental crimes, we can prevent damage before it happens. As we look to the future, it’s clear that the tide of public opinion is turning in many countries.

The question now is: will leaders and policymakers worldwide listen and take action?

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor