elisa-ventur-bmJAXAz6ads-unsplash

(Credit: Elisa Ventur on Unsplash)

COPENHAGEN, Denmark — Computers may be much more advanced than they were 15 years ago — but a new study finds despite vast improvements in computer technology, a staggering 11 to 20 percent of our time spent on computers is still plagued by crashes and other failures. Researchers at the University of Copenhagen and Roskilde University say the frustrations lead to wasted time, lost productivity, and a need for countless system changes.

“It’s incredible that the figure is so high,” says Professor Kasper Hornbæk, the study’s author.

“Most people experience frustration when using computers and can tell a horror story about an important PowerPoint presentation that was not saved or a system that crashed at a critical moment. Everyone knows that it is difficult to create IT systems that match people’s needs, but the figure should be much lower, and one thing that it shows is that ordinary people aren’t involved enough when the systems are developed,” Hornbæk adds in a university release.

The study involved 234 participants, including IT professionals and proficient computer users, and identified situations where computers failed or hindered task completion. Common issues reported included slow system performance, temporary freezing, crashes, and difficulty finding necessary functions. Surprisingly, the study found that these fundamental problems persist today, just as they did 15 to 20 years ago.

With 88 percent of Danes using computers at work, the study reveals that a substantial portion of a normal working week is wasted due to computer problems. Hornbæk emphasizes the significance of minimizing these issues, not only for increased productivity but also to reduce individual frustration. The researchers propose investing resources in redesigning system error notifications to shield users from unnecessary information and allowing computers to autonomously resolve problems.

office worker bored
(Credit: Andrea Piacquadio from Pexels)

To address the persistent frustrations, the researchers suggest involving users more actively in the design and development of computer systems. By prioritizing ease of use and comprehensibility, IT developers can ensure that systems align better with users’ needs. Prof. Hornbæk asserts that the problem lies not with users but with the systems themselves, highlighting the importance of creating user-friendly systems.

The study underscores the need for improved computer systems that minimize malfunctions and enhance user experiences. By investing in user-centric approaches and involving users in system design, researchers aim to reduce frustrations and optimize productivity. The findings shed light on the pressing need for more user-friendly systems and provide hope for a future with fewer computer-related headaches.

The study is published in the journal ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction.

You might also be interested in:

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Comment