other coffee_alonso

Coffee with milk. Credit: Alonso Nichols/Tufts University

Calories in Americans’ Coffee Rose Nearly 40 Percent Since 2003, Mostly Because of Creamer

In A Nutshell

  • Average coffee intake held steady from 2003 to 2018, but its calories rose nearly 40 percent.
  • Non-dairy creamer drove most of the rise, from under 8 to nearly 19 calories a day.
  • By 2017-2018, creamer added more calories than sugar or dairy milk.
  • Health effects were not tested, but extra sugar and fat may offset coffee’s benefits.

Americans’ daily cup of coffee looks the same as it did in 2003, yet it carries nearly 40 percent more calories, according to a new analysis of federal health data. Adults are not drinking more of it. The extra calories came mostly from what they stirred in, and one ingredient leads the pack: non-dairy creamer.

By 2017-2018, creamer had become the biggest calorie source among everything added to coffee, and its own contribution had more than doubled, from under 8 calories a day to nearly 19. Those numbers look small, but they are averages across all U.S. adults, including people who skip coffee. Only about half of adults drink it daily, so a regular drinker likely takes in more.

Moderate coffee drinking is often linked to health benefits, and researchers at Tufts University’s Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy wanted to know what is landing in the cup alongside it. Creamers and sweetener alternatives have become far more available in recent decades, but how Americans actually use them in coffee had not been extensively studied. Their paper is set to appear in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

Survey of 30,459 Adults Shows Non-Dairy Creamer Calories Climbing

Researchers dug into the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a long-running federal project that asks Americans what they eat and drink. They pulled eight rounds covering 2003 through 2018 and kept 30,459 adults ages 20 and older who completed two detailed dietary interviews. Pregnant or breastfeeding women and a small number of people who reported extreme calorie intake were set aside.

Trained interviewers spoke with each participant twice, first in person and then by phone a few days later. Participants walked through everything they had eaten and drunk the previous day, including every coffee and everything added to it. Researchers sorted each drink into coffee and extras, such as milk, cream, creamer, sugar, and sweeteners, and broke premade drinks like lattes into their ingredients using government nutrition data. Results were adjusted to reflect all U.S. adults, and participants’ age, income, sleep, and work hours were recorded too, allowing comparisons between groups.

Coffee Calories
Coffee intake held steady from 2003 to 2018, but its calories climbed nearly 40 percent, mostly because of creamer. (Image by StudyFinds)

By 2018, Non-Dairy Creamer Calories Outweighed Sugar and Dairy Milk in Coffee

In 2017-2018, the average adult drank roughly one and two-thirds eight-ounce cups a day, nearly identical to 2003-2004, and about a tenth of that volume was add-ins rather than coffee. By weight, dairy milk was the most common add-in, with creamer second and sugar third. Calories told a different story, and the ranking flipped: creamer topped the list, sugar followed at 16 a day, and dairy milk at 11.

Creamer is calorie-dense, which helps explain the flip. Powdered creamer packs more calories per gram than sugar, based on the USDA values the researchers used, and the authors say its popularity likely reflects its convenience as a shelf-stable alternative to dairy cream, sold in the U.S. since the 1950s.

Other shifts were small, and none rivaled creamer. Non-dairy milks such as oat, almond, and coconut rose too but added far fewer calories, while dairy and sugar showed no significant change.

Habits varied by group in 2017-2018. Men drank more coffee than women, but women took in more calories from theirs. Non-Hispanic White adults and higher earners drank more than other groups, while non-Hispanic Black adults drank less. People who slept less or worked longer hours drank more, a pattern familiar to anyone who has leaned on a third cup during a rough week. The rise in coffee calories did not differ significantly between groups.

Creamer Calories May Offset Coffee’s Health Benefits

Earlier research has tied coffee drinking to lower risks of heart disease and type 2 diabetes, and the Tufts team says added creamer could chip away at that. Non-dairy creamer is often made with hydrogenated (chemically hardened) oils, which can add trans fat or high amounts of saturated fat, depending on how they are processed. Roughly 20 percent of powder-based creamer, by weight, is saturated fat, which the authors say helps explain creamer’s outsized calorie contribution. Some creamers also contain emulsifiers, additives that keep ingredients blended, and one large earlier study linked certain emulsifiers to higher risks of prostate and breast cancer.

Researchers also cite a recent analysis of national survey participants. Black coffee and coffee with little added sugar or saturated fat were associated with a 14 percent lower risk of death from any cause compared with no coffee. No such benefit appeared for coffee with more than 5 grams of added sugar, a little over a teaspoon, or more than 1 gram of saturated fat per eight-ounce cup.

Extra coffee calories may also cancel out some of what Americans have saved by drinking less sugary soda, the authors say, though the paper does not measure that directly.

This study tracked what people consumed, not their health outcomes, so it cannot say whether creamer causes harm. It does show where the extra calories came from. Americans are not drinking more coffee, but they are stirring in more, and for anyone counting calories, creamer is the ingredient to watch.


Disclaimer: This article is based on peer-reviewed scientific research but is intended for informational purposes only and is not intended to serve as medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a licensed physician, registered dietitian, or qualified healthcare provider with any questions regarding a medical condition or before making changes to diet or health routines.


Paper Notes

Limitations

Participants reported their own diets, so memory gaps and day-to-day swings in what people eat and drink can affect the numbers, a standard limitation the authors acknowledge. The authors also did not apply a statistical method that adjusts for within-person variation, though they say average intake for the population remains valid. Calorie values for some foods were updated in certain survey rounds, which could shift estimates, although the authors argue this is unlikely to explain the rise in creamer and total coffee calories. A small share of USDA food entries, under 4 percent, lacked ingredient details, so creamer and sugar amounts for those items were estimated from caffeine, sugar, and fat content, which could introduce some misclassification. Trends for Asian/Pacific Islander adults and other Hispanic adults were not analyzed because reliable estimates were not available across all survey rounds. The design shows trends over time, not cause and effect, and the data end in 2018, so current consumption may differ.

Funding and Disclosures

According to the paper, there was no funding to report for this study, and the authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Publication Details

The study, titled “Trends in the Consumption of Coffee and Coffee Additions Among U.S. Adults Aged 20+ Years, The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2018,” was authored by Yongyi Pan, Bingjie Zhou, and Fang Fang Zhang of the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University. Zhang, a professor and division chair of Nutrition Epidemiology and Data Science, is the corresponding author. It is set to appear in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (2026), accepted October 12, 2026, and was reviewed here as a journal pre-proof that has not yet gone through final copyediting. Suggested citation: Pan Y, Zhou B, Zhang FF. Trends in the Consumption of Coffee and Coffee Additions Among U.S. Adults Aged 20+ Years, The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2018. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2026.156908.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor